2792276, There are reasons why Duncan was first ballot and Webber wasn’t… Posted by ThaTruth, Sat May-27-23 12:18 AM
>Only in a world of alternative facts would someone believe >that garbage. CWebb was an outstanding scorer and had great >handles for a big guy. I loved CWebb going back to his Fab 5 >days, but he was not seeing Duncan. > >Head to head, Duncan averaged more ppg than CWebb. When it >mattered Duncan elevated his play. He played in over 250 >playoff games from age 21 through 39, averaging just under >21ppg. CWebb played in 80 playoff games from age 20-33, >averaging under 19ppg. He averaged 20 ppg or more 4 times, >with his high being 24.4. Duncan averaged 20ppg or more 10 >times and averaged 24.4 or more 4 times. To say Duncan was a >more efficient scorer too. To say he was ‘nowhere near the >scorer’ as CWebb is a pretty ridiculous statement to make.
Duncan was obviously better overall but Webber had higher highs and lower lows scoring plus the other offensive categories can’t be disputed I don’t know why people get in their feelings about this lol
|