>
>>I also feel like the Warriors felt pressured to give Poole
>>that deal after the Draymond thing
>
>we'll never know i guess (well, in todays landscape we might
>find out one day), but i'm SURE the team felt pressure after
>that to do something for poole.
>
>even so, they were always intent on keeping him far as anyone
>knows, so i guess that doesn't really matter i guess, outside
>of maybe they paid him a bit more than they had originally
>intended?

I think they were going to re-sign Poole anyway too I just think the Draymond shit may have expedited it
>
>i'd love to know how Steph feels about all this:
>
>-the punch
>-klay (and him not staying fresh in the offseason)
>-poole
>-the plan to bank on the young guys
>-not trying to resign some guys (which was also affected by
>how much they'd have to pay/ended up paying poole)
>
>but he'll never say.

the thing about Steph in all his glory is he never seemed to be a big vocal guy on or off the court he seems to be content letting Dray be that guy