You just want to disregard everything the Judge rules on accept for what you
agree with.

The judge gave him a 6 game ban - fact.

The sexual conduct that she said he was guilty of was a non-violent
in nature.

She gave a judgement without selectivity, bias or prejudice and she
did it on a foundation of fairness and equity.

Like I said you want to acknowledge one aspect of the judgement and
disregard the other.

Also, her opinion or judgement of him being a sexual predator or him
displaying sexual misconduct is not based on physical evidence. It’s based
on him not going with the therapists that were given to him
by the team, and seeking out therapists from social media. That’s not
proof or evidence beyond a reasonable doubt…..but that’s another
argument.

Also, also, sexual misconduct is not defined in the collective bargaining agreement,
and the punishment or punishment standard that the NFL is seeking is not in the CBA,
so trying to implement a punishment without notice or contractual stipulation would
not be a ground of fairness and would in fact go against the CBA…..

And the judge clearly stated that in her memo.