... Grayson would've needed security leaving the stadium.

I get Grayson has way more history than Brooks, and that (earned) context matters, but I'm just saying, that same foul from someone with a reputation? No one's even remotely questioning a suspension.

I think too much emphasis is placed upon "did the player intend on that play being dirty?" rather than what it should be placed upon imo, which is "did the execution end up dirty?" I don't really care if Brooks is a dirty player or deserves a dirty reputation or any of that-- but the foul itself was super dirty, and that moment was super worthy of suspension imo.