Nope.. I won’t let it go even tho the SEC bammed it up with that bullshit realignment nonsense.

After Georgia there are no teams separating themselves from the pack.

and lets be real, the rivalries are trash now so let that shit go.. lol.

and the committee is still making it up as they go and dammit, the SEC is getting way too much credit to these 3 loss teams. Pretty sure if Florida wins next week they will sneak back into the top 25, lol.

Prob could’ve just bumped up the old thread and reread the responses

and I have no idea how that shit works anyways.. lol

Cause nobody agrees with you

You might need to just get over it at this point

its not that serious

I love how bent out of shape you get over my opinion on this

after the fact

im doing plenty ok over here thank you


>its not that serious
>
>I love how bent out of shape you get over my opinion on this
>
>

you always quick to rush in when you could simply keep it moving.

acting like you own college football post on OKS. lol



good day to you

i dont recall taking ownership of this thread or anything else

always happy to have cfb convo as demonstrated with others below

that doesnt mean i still can't laugh at you for obsessing over this...unless of course it's you who has ownership of all cfb threads and won't allow it. or ya know, maybe possibly it's actually you who needs to lighten up.

in other words, stop projecting.

this is a garbage repeat post, and your contributions to it have just been "____ fan?" and other similarly shallow whining

despite that a small pocket of deeper conversation emerged, and coincidentally thats the only thread you arent in. how curious...

the reality is most of the people against an expanded playoff are fans of power 5 schools who don’t want to see these smaller programs pull off the upset.

There is no other reason for not wanting an expanded playoff.

More mediocrity? the fuck does that even mean? Yall want Georgia to play itself in the playoffs this year? What is the reason for not wanting to see 12 teams play it out ON THE FIELD to determine a champion?

Right now we have a rep for the playoffs who said “MSU beat Michigan last week, but they lost.. so we think Michigan is better this week?” huh?????

and Bama at #2 to ensure they don’t t make it if they lose.. smh. Nah, its the opposite. Its so obvious the committee wants Bama in even tho they aren’t that good this year and have no significant wins because the SEC is down this year.

look man I'm not here to stifle any conversation or discourage anyone from posting. that's the last thing I wanna do.

if I came off that way then I apologize, it wasn't my intent.

if someone wants to go down this rabbit hole again with you then have at it.

are fans of major programs who benefit from the current formula.

hope cincy gets a shot

baaaaaah

yall some lame sheep…

>
>yall some lame sheep…

>and lets be real, the rivalries are trash now so let that shit
>go.. lol.


Bama playing uga for the sec championship AND a de facto playoff elimination game is gonna be wild

>Bama playing uga for the sec championship AND a de facto
>playoff elimination game is gonna be wild

To be clear, I definitely hope I'm wrong

Bama is def out if they lose to UGA

too many mistakes all over the field. they still gotta play @ Auburn, which hasn't turned out well very often lately.

if they lose, Texas a&m might be headed to the Atlanta.

either way, I'm don't see this bama team beating UGA.

Mich kinda needs to win this sat though. Which is very possible.

but it would certainly help

osu needs to handle their business too which is no guarantee

their resume so it’s hard to really gauge how good they are. I think the only ranked team they beat is Wisconsin (who PSU also beat). They barely squeaked by Nebraska and Rutgers. With that said, they very much could beat PSU since PSU is very sloppy and inconsistent. I’ll actually be taking my son to his first ever PSU game - and probably my first in well over a decade. One of my former students/players starts on all the special teams for PSU (#37).

the coaching uncertainty cannot be helping.

i dont think mich is a great team by any stretch but unlike previous seasons they seem to be getting the most out of their talent while psu isn't.

I'm hoping that psu gets up for this game like they do most years and like they did against osu.

>i dont think mich is a great team by any stretch but unlike
>previous seasons they seem to be getting the most out of their
>talent

outside of the DC forgetting the college substitution rule against MSU there has been almost nothing to bitch about. they end up kicking too many FGs, but at least they are converting them

bad teams get nothing, decent teams get very little, and Cade is rolling. playing like this and losing will not be a bummer the way Lloyd Carr's losses to mediocre teams were.

>Nope.. I won’t let it go even tho the SEC bammed it up with
>that bullshit realignment nonsense.
>
>After Georgia there are no teams separating themselves from
>the pack.
>
>and lets be real, the rivalries are trash now so let that shit
>go.. lol.
>
>and the committee is still making it up as they go and dammit,
>the SEC is getting way too much credit to these 3 loss teams.
>Pretty sure if Florida wins next week they will sneak back
>into the top 25, lol.

lmao

I've heard an argument that expansion isn't so much about competition but about maintaining and building awareness for non-blue bloods.

As it is now, if you're not in the Top 6 annually, no one cares about your program. Schools that bubble up are talked about in the context of them missing out on the Playoff rather than the outstanding play of the school.

Like, take UC, for instance. Nearly losing last week is framed as them being unworthy of the Playoff. No one is pointing to their potential as an ascending program. Or the accomplishment of finishing undefeated (if they do).

And if they don't make it, I don't think they will receive the level of attention and praise that they deserve for getting this far as a G5 program. The Playoff will define their season, whether they make it or not. While that would be great if they make it, it would be a shame that their season is looked at in any way other than a complete success.

Even though it has more teams involved in the Playoff than the BCS, I think the current system has made fans more entitled. They all view their team as lacking if they're not a top-four school.

I'm a big Mizzou fan. Unfortunately, we will likely never make it to the four-team Playoff like we only were on the skirts of the BCS the one year in '08. But if Mizzou finished in the top 10 one year and made the Playoff, we'd eat off that season for a decade. Whereas now, the fan base would maybe feel more dismayed because we couldn't crack the top 4.

Maybe expanding to 12 adds to the fuel for fan entitlement, but at least more fan bases get satisfaction at the end of the year.

It could work out well for excellent games too. For example, you could give the top 4 teams byes and then let the remaining eight play in a first round. I imagine some of the games would be wildly competitive. We all like the first couple of rounds of March Madness, even though 75% of the games don't feature likely championship-worthy schools. The CFP could be similar.

Could you imagine the mad making if UC beat UGA in a 1-4 matchup. Georgia's fans would lose their minds.

I'm not usually a 'choose chaos' kind of guy, but I'd love to see that.

instead of throwing these 1 loss bums like Oklahoma and ND to the playoffs to get blown out by 30… let UC or whoever is hot one year get a shot.

which is why I want it expanded.

People say more mediocrity but what it really would be is more power 5 schools in the top 12 getting exposed.

But the powers that be want to continue playing musical chairs with teams like PSU Wisky and Auburn who have 3 losses and still get ranked in the top 20 to help other teams in their conference.

but the committee still thinks Michigan.. lol.

Getting up in arms about any of these rankings is comical considering they have no bearing on the following weeks rankings.

so probably not something to lose sleep over

not making it into a playoff the 4 times ahead of them didnt even deserve to be in.

the committee says Buckeyes losing 8 weeks ago to Oregon matters..

but Michigan losing 2 weeks ago to MSU doesn’t matter

why should MSU have to win out to jump Michigan?

why should we have to look ahead when we can look back 2 fucking weeks and see MSU beat Michigan in their house?

I'll hang up and listen.

when it comes to which head to head matchups matter when ranking teams?

I'm happy to see a Black coach secure the bag, but it seems really reactionary to sign him for 10 years at 95 million to keep him from leaving, in the middle of his second year and first good season...

He's been doing great in recruiting though and the results this year will only help. The timing is just weird to me, especially considering their OSU game is Saturday...

>but it seems
>really reactionary to sign him for 10 years at 95 million to

that's a lot of money. but a lot of big time gigs are opening up this year too.

other coaches also getting paid. You know Ryan Day's agent gotta be licking his chops ready to get that re-up at OSU after this news...


https://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/college/michigan-state-university/2021/11/17/msu-set-give-tucker-10-year-95-million-extension/8654860002/

MSU set to give Mel Tucker historic 10-year, $95 million contract
Matt Charboneau
The Detroit News

Michigan State and football coach Mel Tucker are closing in on a new contract, one that will make him among the highest-paid coaches in college football.

A source close to the negotiations confirmed to The Detroit News on Wednesday that Tucker will get a 10-year, $95 million contract that will make him the highest-paid coach in the Big Ten and the second-highest paid coach in the country behind Alabama's Nick Saban, a former MSU coach who makes $9.753 million. The new deal would also increase the salary pool for assistant coaches, which was at $6 million when Tucker was hired. The source requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the deal.

The deal is expected to be announced as early as Thursday, according to the source.

other the last 5 to 10 years.

Get that money!!! But I will not be surprised if 4 years from now they are paying $15 mill to buy him out.

Matt Ishbia from United Wholesale Mortgage, and Steve St. Andre. But yeah - that’s a LOT of money vs. a small sample size of results on the field.

this is how it plays out for perfect chaos


Buckeyes just lost
Michigan loses to Iowa or Wisky in the Big10 championship


Bama loses to Auburn
Bama beats Georgia in the SEC championship


OKState beats Oklahoma
OKState loses championship game

Bama should drop but they won’t

I was really pulling for auburn today smh


>this is how it plays out for perfect chaos
>
>
>Buckeyes just lost
>Michigan loses to Iowa or Wisky in the Big10 championship
>
>
>Bama loses to Auburn
>Bama beats Georgia in the SEC championship
>
>
>OKState beats Oklahoma
>OKState loses championship game
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

theres Bama, Michigan, Cincinnati, and...what?

if the committee had a set of balls on them they would put Utah in there but calling them "deserving" would be a long stretch

more deserving than U(sic)GA tho.

to justify NO EXAPNSION

Take your bracket home. Shits moronic

I hope Michigan hangs 40 on these frauds

like the committee would’ve kept UGA out if OKState won.


and dude acts like he hasn’t been sitting next to Corso all season while Corso has said a group of 5 should never make the playoffs.

in regards to Herbstreit trying to act like the committee deserves a medal for
finally including an undefeated team who probably bas the best road win of any team this year in the top 10 right now.