Preseason is preseason,
>but it
>does give some signs on what a team is going to be.

Did you offer the same critique for the 1-4 Nuggets or the 1-3 Champion Bucks this preseason?

So we think the Bucks are really a .333 winning % team because the pre-season is giving us signs of what they're going to be?

c'mon.

Lakers are about to conduct a monstrous chemistry project, for sure. It's not really fair to judge how good (or bad) this team will be until they've played together for at least 15-20 games. Let's revisit this then. We haven't even seen them playing together at full-strength over the course of a full game yet and you've already got it figured out.


-->