>What he DID and where he is now are two different things.
>
>Which player is the low risk investment?
>
>Easily, its Tebow.
>
>You’re buying something very low that could lead to huge
>returns because of the following Tebow has in Florida.
>
>Example:
>
>Deshaun Watson, who I profusely support, is still on
>Houston’s roster.
>He has 22 sexual misconduct cases dangling over his head.
>However he is
>an elite, young QB, and his ability will out live and outweigh
>his off the field
>issues, so the upside is huge ...making it worth the risk.
>
>CK will come with a lot of baggage, controversy, and coverage
>that owners
>feel aren’t worth the risk.
>

This is just facts.

The upside to bringing in Kaep is questionable. The downside could be significant.

There is no risk in bringing Bortles in, it won't move a needle.

If Kaep was better, he would be in the NFL. Or if he wasn't a polarizing figure to whitey, he would be in the NFL.