If citing his numbers implies anything, then that’s you drawing those implications. I’m merely making note of the reality of his current statistics. You thought that I was making an agenda when I cited his stats the first time, and you still think I am. But his numbers are his numbers. Citing them doesn’t an agenda make.

Cam Reddish’s numbers are similar to Cole’s in many categories. He has the same BPM. Slightly better VORP or OWS, but worse 3PT shooting. Now, by citing that, does that mean I have an anti-Cam agenda by saying Cole’s shooting better? Or am I just pointing out some numbers?