>I tried to watch the show several times, but it was too much
>of a replication of PTI, but
>lacking personality, and I’m not that huge of a PTI fan. The
>platform is focused more on debating and less on discussion.
>Also, the show has a very arrogant tone to it, especially in
>how they deliver their dialogue, thinking they know more than
>everyone else. It’s cut from that LeBatard or highly
>questionable cloth (another show that I dislike). Those shows
>that have absolute takes, and that no other takes matter. Too
>subjective.
>
>I watch The Jump, Jalen and Jacoby, and I can stomach PTI.
>What makes Jalen and Jacoby work so well is that their show is
>a combination of debate and discussion. The communication is
>balanced. They are not barking at each other, and they are not
>just going along for the ride either.
>
>I grew up listening to sports radio and still listen to sports
>radio, as well as watching the sports reporter on espn. The
>debates and discussions are and were more in depth, and not
>just aggressive 1-2 minute hot takes, and they didn’t and
>don’t take shots at each other.
>
>Highly Questionable, Around the Horn, PTI, and High Noon are
>all the same thing, where they give these quick hot takes in a
>certain amount of time, and they all come on right after each
>other. Sooner or later the audience is going to get bored or
>disinterested , and that’s going to lead to shows getting
>cancelled or left out because of overcrowding of shows that
>all do the same thing.
>
>
>