>Not what it said. Like, at all. Did you think no one would
>read it? Hell, did you read it?

It literally said that it should be 1A and 1B. That
the gap between them is shockingly close, and that there
are many arguments for Lebron.

That is what it said. Lol



>I agree for the most part. But again, you are allowed to say
>Barkley is too low, but Kobe fans aren't? L O L never change,
>man

Kobe is third tier, so they have him about right

The legend of Kobe being anywhere near the top tier of
basketball players is one of the great hilarious lies
of basketball

>These lists in general are made for debates. Their love of
>advanced states like "value over replacement player" is
>fucking hilarious weather or not you agree with the list.
>
>
>Wait, haven't you made fun of advanced stats before? But they
>are cool when they support your stance? LOL I'm crying.

Umm my specific beef is that *I* understand how to use them
responsibly. Most dickheads do not.



----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "