>Using the “greatest of all-time” standard that I proposed,
>Russell cannot be considered in the elite because although he
>won multiple times and excelled at defense, he was not
>dominant offensively. Furthermore, if his game was translated
>into today (10 ppg, 12-13 rpg, and 3 bpg—numbers similar to
>Dikembe Mutombo’s career), overall Bill Russell would not
>have the same effect on the league.

Furthermore, if Steph Curry's game were translated into the 70s, the lack of a 3-point line, prevalance of very physical defense, and regression in medical technology in dealing with his ankle issues would have gave him a Tiny Archibald-like career. Overall Steph Curry would not have the same effect on the League.