Everyone didn’t thump their chest.

Everyone who replied wasn’t on some macho, prideful bullshit. Some folks had a more thoughtful take on the subject.

So what then? Only post a response that’s just as macho and prideful as those who are? Is that the only tone or tact that’s allowed or acceptable? Should there be no attempt to find reason?

Because a contrary response elicited a ton of “THEY JUST POSTURING! NO WAY IN HELL IS THiS COOL! THEY HAPPY TO SEE JACK IN ACCOUNTING TO DICK DOWN WIFEY!”

And don’t give me this spill about not engaging them either. I could have posted my thoughts without replying directly to Chernic and the same string of responses would have occurred.

People post like jackals when someone deviates from groupthink whether or not you’re going at them directly. People talk about me going back and forth yet somehow neglect the fact that it requires two parties in a given exchange.