I mean that's cool. not sure what's so hard about that to admit, but ok.


>If you are, that's fine. But this exchange would make sense.
>
>If you are not, then why can't you comprehend?
>
>As late of last year, in order for Kemba to be on a contending
>team he would have to be the 3rd guard. Now that doesn't mean
>he was not a good NBA Player.

The season before he made the playoffs in his second year as a starter and put up 20/6/4/2 shooting 47% FG in the series vs the defending champion Heat, but as of last year you thought he needed to be a backup because you couldn't win with him in the NBA. So no, you didn't know that he would be a good player.


>Simple.
>
>Easy to understand.
>
>Straight forward.

"Kemba needs to be a backup. Can't win in the NBA with him."

Simple.

Easy to understand.

Straight forward.