Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Sports
Topic subjectRE: They have a roster of about 44 main roster men and 15 women
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=2415017&mesg_id=2421121
2421121, RE: They have a roster of about 44 main roster men and 15 women
Posted by jimaveli, Fri Feb-13-15 11:33 PM
Nxt gets the simple stuff right by trucking along as an unapologetic wrestling show that follows wrestling rules.

- They pretend everyone is of some importance.
- Heels and faces play their damn roles! Kevin steen is a mfing heel. He's lying. He's all about himself. He double-crossed and critical'd his indy homeboy for a developmental wwe title...and he did it immediately upon arrival. Imagine what he's gonna do him when they are on the main roster.
- About that....the show is booked like just about everyone is there to win a title. Even if they get caught in some personal shit from time to time, the end game is to be winning a title. Imagine that. When was the last time R-Truth even said 'title'?
- The buck stops at the wrestling. If you suck at wrestling, you're not winning and keeping titles. Fuck your 'look'. Wrestle.


>5 hours of TV time to film plus Network exclusive stuff. NXT
>has 30 official men and 8 women, with one hour per week to
>film.
>
>Main roster could, presumably, slow play some of their angles
>(like they've been forced to do with the title due to Brock's
>arrangement). Give the women time to put on actual matches and
>not three minute races to distraction rollups. Develop feuds
>for the championship that don't revolve around non-title loss,
>fifty-fifty bullshit. Use local talent or lower-tier
>superstars (like, JTG was on the main roster forever and
>appeared on what, two Raws after Cryme Tyme broke up?) to
>establish the bonafides of the mid and upper card. Give us a
>proper tag division. And for god's sake, don't use a 20 minute
>promo to do what a 5 minute segment could accomplish. Because
>you know what we hate a LOT more than "wrestling for
>wrestling's sake (and memo to Vince, we don't hate that at
>ALL)?" Talking for talking's sake.
>
>I mean, shit, Hulk Hogan wasn't on every Superstars in the
>pre-Raw era. But people still wanted to tune in to see if this
>would be a week for him. Do that with Cena. Do that with
>Reigns. And hell, cycling guys off could help with some of
>injury problems.