2491884, nope...i thought you were talking about where they were in 2012
Posted by Basaglia, Fri Nov-06-15 11:55 AM
>>you pressed to lie. in 2012, russ was a 24, 6 and 5 guy.
>Rose
>>didn't have better stats in 2012. And Russy wasn't a
>>sidekick...he was option 1A. He's STILL option 1A.
>
>You better look again bucko:
>http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/OKC/2012.html
>
>Russ = 23.6/5.5/4.6 on 46% shooting
>NOT better than MVP Rose
rose had a GREAT year the season before, but um...russ was playing better than next year.
>Secondly, when a dude on your team is doing 28/8/3.5 on 50%
>shooting, he is the CLEAR #1.
i don't care about none of this. russ stats were better than rose's in 2012. he had surpassed rose before rose was injured. simple as that. y'all dudes ONLY worry about "Who so and so got" when they start winning. when bammas be losing next to scrubs, y'all always wanna blame them. nah, stay focused. head-up, russ had better numbers and made the finals. and he STILL better 3 years later.
|