2306538, franchise qb? LOL Posted by temps2020, Thu Mar-13-14 03:54 PM
>I thought Glennon looked better as the season went on. > >http://nfl.si.com/2014/03/12/lovie-smith-josh-mccown-tampa-bay-buccaneers/?eref=sihp > >Neither head coach Lovie Smith nor GM Jason Licht attempted to >hide the fact that Tampa Bay thought it could upgrade at >quarterback over 2013 rookie starter Mike Glennon. > >“Whenever you have a chance to get a franchise quarterback, >you have to consider that,” Smith said at the combine when >asked about Tampa Bay’s draft plans, implying rather obviously >that Glennon did not fall under the “franchise QB” umbrella. > >“New coach, new regime, you can’t just hand the keys over and >say this guy is our starter,” said Licht, via the Tampa Bay >Times. “You have to see what he is, and competition drives the >best out of everybody.” > >Any desire for an open quarterback competition, though, fell >by the wayside Wednesday when Tampa Bay landed the veteran >quarterback it was after: ex-Chicago backup-turned-replacement >starter Josh McCown. During the press conference to announce >McCown’s signing, Smith was asked if the 34-year-old >journeyman would be his starter heading toward the 2014 >season. > >Smith’s reply: “Yes, he is.” > >There are two implications to be drawn from that statement. >One is that Glennon’s future suddenly looks quite murky, >despite a performance last season that was better than most >expected. Any incumbent QB — and most players, regardless of >position — is put on automatic notice when a coaching regime >change occurs, and Smith wanted to get a player of his >choosing under center. > >The other, more sweeping conclusion to be drawn from Smith’s >comment: He is of the opinion that this Tampa Bay team can >compete and win immediately. > >That is a bold stance to take when inheriting a 4-12 team, let >alone one in what shapes up to be a brutal division. It also, >for now, places an awful lot of faith in McCown, who, before >subbing in for Jay Cutler last season, was a combined 12-19 in >his career with five teams. He also has not entered a season >with a starting job since he did so for the Raiders way back >in 2007. McCown was plenty steady for the Bears in 2013, but >running the show from start to finish is another challenge >entirely. > >But the Buccaneers — in some ways like the Chiefs of 2012 — >had more talent than their record indicated, perhaps needing >only a coaching change, QB swap and upgrades in some key >positions to make a serious leap up the standings. > >Is Tampa Bay ready for that sort of move? Probably not quite >yet. Smith’s initial faith in McCown indicates that he feels >otherwise; or, at the very least, that the remaining holes on >his roster are fillable before Week 1 arrives. > >The Tampa Bay fans should appreciate that approach, even if >they want to join the rest of us in feeling skeptical. This >franchise has not made the playoffs since 2007 and has not won >in the postseason since taking home a Super Bowl crown in >2002. The plan by bringing in Smith was to avoid a long, >drawn-out rebuilding process. Sticking with Glennon as the >starter would have been a nod toward that approach, with the >future taking precedence over the present. > >McCown may not be the right guy to lead the charge from >mediocrity to contention. Smith, though, made it clear that he >believes McCown will move Tampa Bay further in that direction >than Glennon.
|