>That's much broader than your narrow "talent assessment." And
>your total opinion on Wroten was clear. He's a talented
>knucklehead that you didn't believe in. Not sure what else
>needs to be said at this point but I'll continue.
>
>>yes. that was the point. and you need to understand that "i
>>don't have a good feeling about him" isn't relevant to a
>>thread CREATED SOLELY FOR ****ASSESSING THE TALENT**** OF
>NBA
>>DRAFT PROPECTS. the actual committal statements i made about
>>TALENT and POTENTIAL BASED ON TALENT you've flat out chosen
>to
>>ignore. why?
>
>"Your opinion on them." If it was truly on a talent assessment
>thread and not a projection thread

but, it wasn't a "projection" thread, because predicted ULTIMATE FAILURE OR SUCCESS for a PROSPECT in any sport not a science. it was a TALENT ASSESSMENT thread. which is why i TAKE RISKS on this board with kids whose TALENT have a strong opinion on. and it seems those risks are all good when i'm wrong, but when i'm right, there's always resistance. WHY?

again...court of law...y'all would lose.