That's much broader than your narrow "talent assessment." And your total opinion on Wroten was clear. He's a talented knucklehead that you didn't believe in. Not sure what else needs to be said at this point but I'll continue.

>yes. that was the point. and you need to understand that "i
>don't have a good feeling about him" isn't relevant to a
>thread CREATED SOLELY FOR ****ASSESSING THE TALENT**** OF NBA
>DRAFT PROPECTS. the actual committal statements i made about
>TALENT and POTENTIAL BASED ON TALENT you've flat out chosen to
>ignore. why?

"Your opinion on them." If it was truly on a talent assessment thread and not a projection thread than why include "I have a bad feeling about him" and other shit about his emotions? Why not keep it to his talent/skills and shut up?


>
> That's what that says. Your words "no one is gonna get
>>to pretend that they thought someone was good or sorry and
>>have the thread drop out of existence" and "nah dogg, we
>
>but, i was on the record when i wrote that as believing he was
>VERY TALENTED and had a HIGH CEILING. you dudes so damn mad
>your "gotcha" moment is failing under scrutiny.

Right, that you didn't believe in. just like your (and my)Demarcus cousins projection.


>
>
>
>>Tell us why you didn't have a good feeling about him?
>
>because he was unfocused and lacked discipline. just like
>hargett and shamgod.

And where are those two?


>
>
>Cause
>>all I see is, he's talented, but I doubt he'll amount to
>much
>>because of emotional iq questions. Also, why weren't you
>>bringing up John Wall then? That's what the thread was for.
>If
>>you felt that he was better than John Wall THEN, I'd say you
>>should've had a GOOD feeling about him, no?
>
>what MATTERS is the TALENT ASSESSMENT. that's what you don't
>want this to be about, despite the thread being EXACTLY about
>that.

What matters, in your words, was "your opinion about them." Where was the word talent in that paragraph? You making amendments now. Sorry.


>
>>Irrelevant. Came after the truthiness thread which was us
>>"going on record for real." That's what you told us. Your
>John
>>Wall thread came after the record was closed. In the court
>of
>>law, the truthiness thread is a dep transcript and your late
>>ass John Wall shit would be hearsay. Wasn't on the record.
>
>what's ON THE RECORD is more than enough.

Right, "I don't have a good feeling about him." That IS more than enough. So stop.


>
>>>now, agendas and butty butt butt hurt feelings aside: why
>do
>>>y'all NEED him to not be on my OKS roster? because klay
>>>beasting and y'all have no "evidence" against me there?
>>>because favors and monroe coming around? because austin
>>rivers
>>>is (quiet as kept) BETTER THAN HARRISON BARNES?
>>
>>Nah. Mostly people like calling other people out when they
>>lie. It's fun.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>just sayin...y'all have invested a lotta time into some
>>>"gotcha!" that ain't even pay off.
>>
>>
>>Again, catching liars in a lie and watching them lie some
>more
>>to avoid getting caught for said lie is fun.
>
>you didn't catch anything., y'all jumped the gun, because you
>don't fukkin read. as usual.

We all caught it. That's why you so lonely right now.