Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Sports
Topic subjectRE: Word?
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=2263694&mesg_id=2387285
2387285, RE: Word?
Posted by Basaglia, Thu Nov-06-14 03:39 PM
>So, clearly, the point of the thread was to hold people to
>their opinions of a player before they played an NBA game,
>right?

yes. that was the point. and you need to understand that "i don't have a good feeling about him" isn't relevant to a thread CREATED SOLELY FOR ****ASSESSING THE TALENT**** OF NBA DRAFT PROPECTS. the actual committal statements i made about TALENT and POTENTIAL BASED ON TALENT you've flat out chosen to ignore. why?

That's what that says. Your words "no one is gonna get
>to pretend that they thought someone was good or sorry and
>have the thread drop out of existence" and "nah dogg, we going
>on record for real." So any later opinions that differed from
>the ones posted in that thread would be irrelevant, right?

but, i was on the record when i wrote that as believing he was VERY TALENTED and had a HIGH CEILING. you dudes so damn mad your "gotcha" moment is failing under scrutiny.



>Tell us why you didn't have a good feeling about him?

because he was unfocused and lacked discipline. just like hargett and shamgod.


Cause
>all I see is, he's talented, but I doubt he'll amount to much
>because of emotional iq questions. Also, why weren't you
>bringing up John Wall then? That's what the thread was for. If
>you felt that he was better than John Wall THEN, I'd say you
>should've had a GOOD feeling about him, no?

what MATTERS is the TALENT ASSESSMENT. that's what you don't want this to be about, despite the thread being EXACTLY about that.

>Irrelevant. Came after the truthiness thread which was us
>"going on record for real." That's what you told us. Your John
>Wall thread came after the record was closed. In the court of
>law, the truthiness thread is a dep transcript and your late
>ass John Wall shit would be hearsay. Wasn't on the record.

what's ON THE RECORD is more than enough.

>>now, agendas and butty butt butt hurt feelings aside: why do
>>y'all NEED him to not be on my OKS roster? because klay
>>beasting and y'all have no "evidence" against me there?
>>because favors and monroe coming around? because austin
>rivers
>>is (quiet as kept) BETTER THAN HARRISON BARNES?
>
>Nah. Mostly people like calling other people out when they
>lie. It's fun.
>
>
>
>>
>>just sayin...y'all have invested a lotta time into some
>>"gotcha!" that ain't even pay off.
>
>
>Again, catching liars in a lie and watching them lie some more
>to avoid getting caught for said lie is fun.

you didn't catch anything., y'all jumped the gun, because you don't fukkin read. as usual.