>"i'm listing all the prospects in this thread...and all you
>gotta do is reply with your opinion on them. that's all i'm
>asking. it can be detailed or you can simply say "he gonna be
>good" or "he gonna be sorry." bottomline is NOBODY is gonna
>get to pretend they thought someone was good or sorry anymore
>and have the thread fall outta evidence/existence. nah, dogg.
>we going on record for real. because bammas on this board STAY
>LYING!"

So, clearly, the point of the thread was to hold people to their opinions of a player before they played an NBA game, right? That's what that says. Your words "no one is gonna get to pretend that they thought someone was good or sorry and have the thread drop out of existence" and "nah dogg, we going on record for real." So any later opinions that differed from the ones posted in that thread would be irrelevant, right?



>
>
>now, did you REALLY read that? good okay...here's what i said
>ABOUT HIM:
>
>
>Subject line: tough kid. very talented. worry about his
>emotional IQ...
>
>"He's one of them kids that thrives on doing highlight type
>shit...that Johnathan Hargett, Shamgod shit...i hate it. when
>they not beasting, they don't wanna play no more and they
>blame everyone else...and sulk. HATE IT!
>
>he has a really high ceiling, but i don't have a good feeling
>about him."

Tell us why you didn't have a good feeling about him? Cause all I see is, he's talented, but I doubt he'll amount to much because of emotional iq questions. Also, why weren't you bringing up John Wall then? That's what the thread was for. If you felt that he was better than John Wall THEN, I'd say you should've had a GOOD feeling about him, no?


>and i was the guy who stepped out and said he's on wall's
>level or HIGHER in terms of talent, skill and athleticism. and
>i was laughed at.

Irrelevant. Came after the truthiness thread which was us "going on record for real." That's what you told us. Your John Wall thread came after the record was closed. In the court of law, the truthiness thread is a dep transcript and your late ass John Wall shit would be hearsay. Wasn't on the record.


>
>now, agendas and butty butt butt hurt feelings aside: why do
>y'all NEED him to not be on my OKS roster? because klay
>beasting and y'all have no "evidence" against me there?
>because favors and monroe coming around? because austin rivers
>is (quiet as kept) BETTER THAN HARRISON BARNES?

Nah. Mostly people like calling other people out when they lie. It's fun.



>
>just sayin...y'all have invested a lotta time into some
>"gotcha!" that ain't even pay off.


Again, catching liars in a lie and watching them lie some more to avoid getting caught for said lie is fun.
>