and Harden? In their prime?

Is he "going in" on the fact that between roster restraints, managment /coaching uncertainty and Kobe being old and coming off significant injury, the Lakers as a whole aren't the most attractive option?

If his only point is that if Kobe was so determined to win above all else, he should have followed Duncan's lead and taken a much more significant pay cut, I have no problem.

If he's doing anything more than that, ignoring the overall state of the Lakers that ISN'T on Kobe and NOT firing away at Dwight, Harden, Morey's supposed genius, and the probable contract match of Parsons as a nice 4th man while all four players get a nice window in the prime of their careers on a stacked team in a state with no state tax, well..... he's just not keeping it 100.