>Paul's an excellent utility player, but I don't know that
>he's the go-to guy. OE is off with his Joe Johnson comparison
>because George is a legit threat on both sides of the ball.

No, they aren't alike.

They are just both Nyquils.

I am not comparing their games.

They are just in the same clade.

>don't know that Joe as the third best guy on any team with two
>other stars makes them a title threat, but on any team that
>already has two certified stars, Paul George as your third guy
>is beastly.

Well, that isn't really saying much.

It remains to be seen what Indy does from here,
>but I suspect Granger gets shopped heavy for point guard and
>some depth.
>
>Meanwhile, Harden has shown he can be the man and is ideal for
>most teams. I do think when looking at the overall balance of
>an established team, adding George would probably be a better
>bet than adding Harden simply due to the greater dynamics he
>brings and the fact that he wouldn't need the ball as much.
>Harden clearly wants to be the Alpha and that probably
>wouldn't work as well.
>
>


----------------------------



O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"




"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "