>But back to the question. Duncan better and I think a really
>simple argument can dead this question. If the Spurs had
>drafted Kobe instead of Duncan, how many chips do you think
>Kobe would have today??? My guess is one, *maybe* two at best
>(and I'm being generous). Swap Kobe for Duncan on the Lakers
>and you're talking 5+ chips with ease. If winning is the
>all-important attribute you're looking for - instead of
>scoring titles and ratings - Duncan is the clear cut better
>player to have on your team.

You think think Pop wouldnt have won with Kobe and Robinson and all those great role players they had?

You think Shaq would've stepped back and let Duncan be the man like Robinson did in San Antonio?