>The Ravens got better the *instant* Caldwell arrived

you're smothering your good point in hyperbole here. let it breathe...

>And I already contrasted John Harbaugh to Jim Harbaugh: I
>have
>actual evidence that Jim is good. I do not have evidence that
>John is good. He barely deserved that job to begin with, and
>few can deny that the Ravens have been good largely because
>the
>core from the last decade (3 DPOYS on the same unit; 2 guys
>who
>are among the 3 best to ever play their position; ) is intact.

what evidence? Jim had 2 Heisman Finalists on his 8 win stanford team and his 2010 stanford team beat 1 good team.

>Peyton Manning deserves tons of credit for Indy 2010. I know
>that he called the plays. In hindsight, he probably should
>have
>let Caldwell call the plays, because Caldwell obviously knows
>that the fuck he's doing.

its better for Caldwell. Manning threw his OL under the bus in 05-06 with the "missed protections" press conference. uh...you called them fuckface.

>No, you're an idiot, because you're treating this as a simple
>race-baiting case, when I'm actually trying to have a
>football
>discussion-

ur kinda throwing shade at John Harbaugh tho, which undermines your case given that he's won a playoff game every year hes been a HC

>Caldwell's influence on the Ravens is undeniable.

but John's isnt?

>And so far, the white
>media is UNDERplaying his influence on the 2013 Ravens,
>even though its CLEAR that he had a positive influence.

this isnt really true tho, ive heard media types talkin bout it.