2120680, The problem I have w/his so called 'Nash doctrine' is that its
Posted by vee-lover, Sun Jan-27-13 08:32 PM
being applied incorrectly as it relates to the player it's named after
it should apply when writers/basketball historians reflect upon Nash's (inflated, overrated) place as an all time great which he isn't. I've always maintained that you can't be as bad on defense as Nash has ALWAYS BEEN and be regarded amonst the All time great point guards notwithstanding his two (undeserved) MVPs.
As far as Crawford being an All Star and the other stuff he wrote abt, it (Crawford being an All Star) had some merit early in the season when he was leading the team in scoring as the 6th man, but now there's other players who have emerged as more deserving.
|