Is he saying Rondo didn't deserve to make the All-Star game? Or that he's made it to games he shouldn't have? If anything, the opening example proves how stupid it is to look at All-Star games when comparing players, not that it makes sense to give a shit about them.

His argument sounded like: Look at how many All-Star games Rondo has gone to compared to other top point guards, that's why we should make sure Jamal Crawford isn't considered for the team but Brook Lopez, now there's a guy who deserves All-Star credentials on his resume.

This article was basically three different All-Star related blog posts poorly mashed together.