>who cares enough about duncan that they're gonna blame the
>lakers for denying him something? i certainly don't. i don't
>think even duncan cares that much. he's probably pretty happy
>with his titles and comfortable with his legacy, even if he
>would LIKE a couple more.

It wasn't about caring. Point is, it happened, and whether or not you or he or anyone 'cares' about it is immaterial to the fact that it happened.

>as a matter of fact, the phoenix series with the suspensions
>made the spurs AND myself WAAAAY HUGER ASSHOLES than anybody
>ever was about some lakers shit.

LOL. Desperation right here. You want to talk about not caring? Nobody gives a fuck about the Spurs. Like at all. People barely remember that they won titles, and didn't give a fuck at the TIME.

Now?

You have to jog people's memory about the Phoenix shit.

Shit, a Lakers losing season is higher up on people's list of interesting NBA shit than a Spurs title.

>i think this (lack of) logic says more about y'all's emotional
>state and how y'all deal with Ls than it says about the rest
>of us.

Meanwhile, your post lacked logic in every conceivable sense. You went on a rant about 'caring' when nobody said shit about 'caring', only that it happened, and did so about a team time and ratings have proven over and again, most people don't care about them.