Go back to previous topic
Forum nameOkay Sports
Topic subjectRE: which amounts to so very little it's funny you even brought it up
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=2106744&mesg_id=2107081
2107081, RE: which amounts to so very little it's funny you even brought it up
Posted by smutsboy, Wed Jan-09-13 11:40 AM
>LOL @ 10-6 mattering.

LOL at you ignoring my point.

10-6 for a team with very little talent on it * * is a sign of what Bob did this year, as he was one of the only good players on the roster. * *

If you think 10-6 wasn't an achievement for this shitty ass roster, go ahead and and explain how great these players are.

>This offense sold Bob Griffin short, that is the issue.

6th best offense in the league. In the MVP discussion. Probable ROY or ROY runner up. One of the best rookie seasons in NFL history.

Yeah, this offense sure wasted his talents, didn't it?



>
>Let him get on with the business of being a quarterback, like
>he was drafted to be.
>
>>Should they consider more of a hybrid offense? Sure.
>>
>>Does the failure of Randall Cunningham and Mike Vick to ever
>>win anything mean nobody should try to invent new hyrbid
>>offenses in the NFL?
>>
>Randall Cunningham had a pretty nice career, so I don't know
>why you're trying to make him out to be garbage to cop pleas
>for this insane set-up of Shanny's.

You're the one crying about running QBs, you tell me.

>
>Holla at me when Bob gets to one MVP season let alone two like
>Randall.
>
>You act like Vick was garbage, he was actually better coming
>out of college than Bob was.

As a PASSER, which you seem to be so obsessed with, Vick was NOT better coming out of college.

Which is it? Vick was a good QB in college and Bob was a good QB this year, or neither.

You can't have it both ways.


>
>>Not in smarts. Not in work ethic. Not in college PASSING
>>experience.
>>
>Vick took VATECH to the national-title game as a 19-year-old,
>if he had hung around as long as Bob did the Heisman would not
>have been an issue.
>
>This offense got in the way of Bob's learning curve on how to
>be a real QB in this league.


Ah yes, back to your nebulous, unprovable theory about Bob's future.

You should probably wait until he has at least one bad season before you try keep pimping this useless theory.

You're 0 for 1 so far.


>
>You can keep creating diversions to make it about Mike Vick or
>some other strawman but the song remains the same in regards
>to RGIII's 'development' which now will be spending its first
>offseason in rehab.

You're the one who mentions Vick and other "running" QBs in Bob posts. Do you need me to link to those posts or do you want to stop pretending?

The Redskins brought a new offense to the NFL this year.

One that finished 6th, despite have precisely three good players on it.

Forgive us for not giving a shit about your predictions for Bob's skills as a QB.