>desean on offense. not too many players who force you to
>gameplan in the league. if i have a player (despite his
>limitations) who can dictate coverage, i'm keeping him. he
>needs a big body opposite him, though.

my thoughts exactly. i'd keep desean over maclin. i like maclin, but he's a pretty standard above average #2 receiver in output, if not in style of play. ideally, i want my number 2 to be a big possession guy, unless the number one is one of the physical freak types like Megatron or T.O. But, yeah, Maclin drops too much and gives up on too much for me to trust as any kind of possession receiver.

>peters. i know he's coming off achilles (2, actually). this is
>high risk/reward. but dude was THE best LT in football before
>he went down. i'll take that gamble and get depth / avg
>starter quality behind him.

depends on the contract and whether that utah kid slips to us at 4

>DEF: graham, cole, kendricks, boykin, thornton.
>
>graham is young and coming into his own. he was legitimately
>good this year. might be a flash in the pan, but he had lots
>of potential coming in from the draft so i'm inclined to
>believe he's sustainable.

yeah, i was pleased with his progress and almost put him on the list


>OFF:
>
>vick. not at no 15 mil.

yeah, peace out, god. Hope he goes somewhere closer to winning and wins himself a super bowl.

>bryce brown - even despite the fumbles. dude basically
>completed his freshman year in the nfl. more work and reps can
>get him to nfl-level fundamentals as an rb. he's a good
>weapon, and insurance for shady. needs to improve in pass pro.

yeah, the potential is staggering (cue Will laughing at us). give him 75 percent of the carries in the preseason, just to get him reps.

>celek?

i'm not even going to read what you wrote about celek, because he's just so slightly above average. he's fine, but keeping him won't make us a winner. he's not a difference maker.

>fuck the rest of the OL. stay, go, whatever.

no vaseline.