>I think my favorite parts of this idiocy were:
>
>- somehow holding it against RG3 that they have a system fully
>tailored to his abilities
>
>- attempting statistical analysis of which QB can make better
>throws with better variety
>
>King is much better when he's evaluating who leads the league
>in toughness and likability.
>
>Seattle is a coffee town. If King has just said, "I like
>Russell, because Seattle coffee", I would have accepted that.
>
>Russell is having one of the best rookie seasons in league
>history.
>
>RG3's is better.
>
>400 more yards in one less game, 7 turnovers to RW's 13, 1.8
>TDs per game to RW's 1.875 TDs per game.
>
>And one less win despite having a terrible defense where
>Seattle's is one of the best in the league.
>
he was using someone else's analysis, not his own.

and yeah, you can shape things to fit your particular argument, and ignore compelling counter-points but the reality is, either of them would be a great ROY selection and are clearly above Luck. and except for you and some others, most wouldn't be MAD if Russ won.