>I offered a counter-point. RW: more TDs, RG3: more yards
>
>BOTH (!) players have points in their favor, but IN CONCLUSION
>the winner (as we agree!) is Bob.
actually, that's NOT the conclusion, the conclusion is that OTHERS could make an argument for russ. just because you and i don't agree doesn't mean that NO GOOD ARGUMENTS exist. for you to say otherwise involves your personal feelings.


>Again, I think the basics of simple argument are escaping you.
>Which is weird, because again, we agree. So clearly there's
>something else at work here that's making you so mad.

i'm not the one who's worried about ROY being awarded to someone else.

>
>> "Yards=fantasy football points.""
>
>But I want to thank you for this quote. It's easily one of the
>stupidest things I've read on OKP in quite a while.
what's stupid is that by taking it out of context and isolating a few words from what i said, you're trying to get away from the point that you had nothing for.

basic mathematics. 5 real touchdowns= 30 REAL points. 600 yards = less points unless they result in 10 field goals. for you to try and act like in any world OTHER than fantasy that 600 yards is equivalent to 5 extra TD passes is comical.