>buzzer beater and all, come on, this guy's career is
>respectable but forgettable.
>
>you're talking about him with HOF'ers and borderline HOF'ers,
>the guy is a first ballot FOH'er, will get 0% of the vote.
>
>like i said, he's a fun player, has lasted a long time. he is
>the antithesis of "all out" though and he didn't find even
>certain things to do consistently like sheed or horry or other
>guys who clearly phoned in portions of their careers.
>
>celery pretty much nailed it above. it's about sample size.

Motherfucka, if we gonna talk about SAMPLE SIZE, IVERSON'S
SAMPLE THE LAST FIVE YEARS BEEN GETTING CUT and
FIRED from TURKISH AND CHINESE league basketball

bwhaahahahahaha

What about Iverson's "sample size" where the Nuggets
got better the SECOND HE LEFT THE FUCKING TEAM,
went to the WC Finals, losing to the eventual champion
Lakers in 6?

He's a fucking LOSER

All while ANDRE MILLER is essentially the SAME AGE and STILL
CONTRIBUTING to ELITE PLAYOFF TEAMS....RIGHT TODAY
Andre Miller got the ball in CRUNCH TIME for a top 3 seed

Iverson is author of the WORST FALLOFF IN THE HISTORY of
basketball and has the most one-dimensional, non-adaptable skill
set of any player in league history. This is why Andre Miller still getting
NBA CHECKS while Iverson is busy being a terrible Homo sapien

Take your L, dunny