>what isn't debatable is that his type of game is a lot easier
>to surround w/quality teammates vs Carmelo, Kobe, and
>Wesbrook.

if its so easy why hasn't he had as much playoff success as those guys or any of the other elite point guards

>As someone said in a reply in this same post, point
>guards usually aren't expected to lead their teams to
>championships...

I think a couple of guys named Earvin and Isiah may question that...


>to some Paul is the exception only because the consensus says
>he's the best pg in the league

again, based on WHAT?

>but history shows that
>championship teams aren't usually led by their point guards

Billups and Parker may disagree with that too. And really other recent Finals MVP's like Wade, Kobe and Lebron who didn't officially have the "point guard" title but were the primarily ballhandlers and playmakers on their teams.

>but as of RIGHT TODAY, if I had to choose btw
>Paul/Melo/Kobe/Westbrook to start a team, I'm going w/the guy
>who doesn't mind getting others involved where as the other
>players mentioned are selfish and try and win games by
>themselves by jacking up bad shot after bad shot.

You're basically talking in circles, you're saying pg's don't lead teams to championships but if you're starting a team you're to take a pg that has never come close to winning anything.