>>Thats a good question though. It's subjective.
>>
>>Id love to be able to say if Jeremy Avgs
>>
>>12 and 6.5 thats good cause he's in the top 10 of all pgs
>>(right where Mike Conley is)
>>
>>but I dont think Conley is that good even though he
>impressed
>>me at times last year.
>
>If Memphis wasn't a playoff team nobody would think Conley is
>good. He's serviceable, he's a "DLG" point guard but he's not
>really a difference maker.

>>then he can avg 16,6, and 3 like Ty Lawson be on a playoff
>>team but --hey people will say that aint worth "15 million".
>>We'll see what Ty makes on his next contract.
>
>The same for him, I've said many times that Lawson wasn't even
>the best PG on his own team.
>
>>Then a guy like John Wall who has phenomenal talent and a
>hell
>>of a pg. Who I think is great but stuck on a shitty team. He
>>avgs 16,8,4 with 3.9 turnovers. Here on OKP land he is
>>mediocre cause he's on a terrible franchise but I guarantee
>>you when John Wall's rookie contract is up--no matter how
>bad
>>his team is he will get a max type deal.
>
>This season is a make or break year for Wall, after a
>promising rookie year he seemed to regress last year, it's not
>a given that hell get a max deal.
>
>>Like I said this shit is all subjective. If someone wants to
>>hold an agenda, they will.
>
>You're right it is subjective and team success plays a factor.
>A lot of people wanted to downgrade Deron because the Nets
>sucked but he still did numbers and got his money and is
>shining on the Olympic team with the best players in the
>world.
>
>You got guys like Conley and Lawson held in high regard
>because they're on playoff teams, but are they really better
>than people like Jennings or Monta?
I agree with everything you said...especially Deron