>by saying he could simply increase his scoring output by 50%
>just like that.

and by watching how they play, yes, he could. Plus, there's the pace issue

and nevermind that Free was doing all that while hitting 60% over 7 games.

>oh you mean like how he chucked up nine treys while going for
>32 against NC asheville?

so you didn't watch that game. unlike walker, those threes were part of a team system. Asheville's 3 point D was their weakness. G'town took advantage. Free's the best shooter.

>uconn scheduled 4 ranked non-conf opponents, gtown scheduled
>2.

umm...Texas (only away one), Kentucky, Michigan State and Tenn.

vs:

Gtown's facing Memphis (away), Mizzou (at Kansas City) and Temple (again, away) was ranked before the season. Gtown also scheduled Utah State (a top 50 school) and ODU away (top 50 school).

The idea that Conn's schedule is stronger than G'towns is just wrong (especially because Mich St and Kentucky were @ a tourney and not scheduled...Conn could have easily faced some bum ass squads instead had they lost to Wichita, which they were close to doing).


>
>your argument is sinking further than austin's draft
>prospects.

those are rising, not sinking. GOOD!

-----------
I have nothing to contribute here, just complaining.