2423885, There's about 8 things wrong with his Wiggins argument Posted by Orbit_Established, Tue Feb-24-15 01:46 PM
Three quick ones (one very similar to the argument you made)
i. As you said, young legs have less total damage, are further from whatever(theoretical) mechanical breaking point that we associate with aging and "decline." This is important if, as many believe, aging is a non-linear process where wear and tear happens faster the more wear and tear you have.
ii. Young legs recover faster. So not only is Wiggins far removed from his decline breaking point, he is more likely to revert back to "fully rested" mode.
iii. A key one: Wiggins is in a very important cognitive-basketball developmental window, where repetition is crucial, and so the minutes now, even if they do cost him time at the end of the career (unlikely but possible), are probably more important for defining the amplitude of his peak during his prime. Allowing him to work out the kinks now, learning how to be a teammate, finding a position, etc is a better financial investment in the long term.
----------------------------
O_E: "Acts like an asshole and posts with imperial disdain"
"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."
(C)Keith Murray, "
|