>>they were not that good.
>>None of those second three-peat finals teams were that good,
>>that's the reason the Pacers were the only team that gave
>them
>>a battle.
>It's all about match-ups, the Pacers had Reggie to make MJ
>work, the Jazz had Russell.
>
>>Those Jazz teams got there by *hanging around*. They weren't
>>really any better than the Jazz teams getting carried in the
>>first or second round the entire ten years before except
>that
>>there wasn't anybody left to play them out West.
>Again, it's all about match-ups, the Jazz used to own everyone
>in the West(including Admiral's Spurs/Kazzam's Lakers) but
>could get past teams Clyde's Blazers nor GP's Sonics....Dream
>also wouldn't be denied in 94/95.
>
>>Sonics were choking & couldn't beat the Rockets,
>The Sonics had the Rocket's number but they just didn't face
>each other during Houston's 2-peat run.
>
>>I don't hold any of those teams in high regard, Jazz
>included
>>& the only reason anyone would is to pump up MJ's legacy.
>MJ's greatness & bling has been known to blind haters all
>over.
>
>>That mid-to-late-90s era was probably the weakest
>competition
>>era team-wise of my lifetime outside Chicago.
>So, you're basically admitting that MJ made the Bulls
>invincible.