2158286, It was SUPPOSED to be in poor taste. That's why they did it. Posted by Buck, Fri Apr-05-13 07:00 AM
More importantly, that's why they had Punk do it.
>said WWE got their permission for it initially, but they >seemed uncomfortable with it once they saw it on tv. Looked >way different than what they were led to believe.
Yeah, and that story has since been updated, as Michael Moody said he was "fine" with the segment.
>And even then, it doesn't matter if Moody would have been good >with it or not.
HOW does that not matter? I mean, you can reserve the right to be offended at whatever you like, but you don't get to dictate taste for anybody else.
|