Go back to previous topic
Forum nameFreestyle Board
Topic subjectRE:
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=7&topic_id=58983&mesg_id=59300
59300, RE:
Posted by freedomfighter, Thu Aug-10-06 09:40 AM
no intent to diss u.
but let us review the issue.
you know i'ma going to get you.

bombs bursting over "IRAC"
here comes the counter attack

does a boy friend own a duty
when dating the runway booty
even if he's on drugs
beating it instead of hugging it
saying he's loving it but he doesn't
quit pimping it superfly
wise guy feeling manly wit
it switching twitching in corners wit a black eye
got it praying to the ski's
asking lord why me baby girl
i'm here to protect your sanity
come on let's get business
but first you gotta speak up
before the weeks up ending up
cut up and wrapped up prime beef
then it will be too late for relief

issue I
whether section 2305.11 of the ohio revise code
stop stupid nigga's from explioding on their
mate when out on a date smashing her between the gate

rule
if i see this should i speak on this girl next door
found holding the floor uncover the rubber still in
the package this rule applies and for guys around the
world be four warn jonnies back protecting weak backs
wit verbal assualt gaps gacs rap packs

analysis
after breaking it down we found yes a boy friend owns
a duty to protect the booty not abuse the booty but
to squeeze the booty and til it smiles and goes wild
from the loving hell you can even tickle the booty
wit a feather to make things better but never never
ever hit the booty because that move me to hunt you
down good will rizing now you hiding from the po pos
because you know you broke the law if she would stand
up and make the call but innocent by standers can step
in and defend under the good samaratin act we to fight
back and protect our women


conclusion
boy friend found guilty of violating this section of the ohio revised code and sentence to 1 month to 1 year imprisonment
finally virus under containment and time is spent wit intentional tort case seeking punitive damages for breach of duty where for
boy friend found negligence per se because if you violate a statute your automatically guilty he he it's free one in the same t t