740125, RE: My only issue with it was a bit of the execution... Posted by pretentious username, Fri Dec-18-20 05:58 PM
>The de-aging CGI seemed to me to be not as good as what was >done in Rogue One. He looked too young, and also a bit like a >video game cutscene. I really noticed on my second watch.
I agree. I wasn’t bothered by the Rogue One de-aging at all, but this one looked pretty bad.
If you >have Grogu go to the seeing stone and call out for any Jedi, >Luke makes sense to hear that call more than anyone else alive >at this time.
Yeah, it would be worse if they just introduced a new Jedi no one had ever heard of before. I just don’t want to see a whole series about bad CGI Luke training a puppet lol.
> >There’s also no way they “retcon” the sequel trilogy.
I certainly hope not. As bad as ROS was it wasn’t bad enough to justify a retcon. It’s just that when I see Luke about to train Grogu, but then realize Grogu was never seen or mentioned in the new trilogy it makes me worry that a retcon is in the works. There’s other ways to explain his absence though, like how they’ve sorta explained Ashoka’s absence from the original trilogy.
|