Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn
Topic subjectPicard
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=737791
737791, Picard
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Jan-23-20 10:22 AM

Starts tonight.

There doesn't seem to be much of a Star Trek contingent around here. But maybe there are a few who, like me, have been looking forward to it for months.

Stewart, Chabon, Borg, "Synths", Romulan refugees, a big pile of money, and a pitbull named "Number One." If this show delivers on its promise it could be the best thing to ever come out of the franchise.

We'll see.
737797, It might be because a lot of us don't fux with CBS Access
Posted by BigWorm, Thu Jan-23-20 03:24 PM
I even borrowed a friend's account to watch the new Twilight Zone and the first two eps of Discovery. After that I was like nah I'm good.

Maaaayybe if people start raving about Picard. That's a big maybe. With Netflix and Amazon and Hulu and Disney+ and HBO Now, I personally might have reached my limit.
737799, ^^ this
Posted by Stadiq, Thu Jan-23-20 03:35 PM

I was never a huge Trek guy, but the trailers for this look cool. I'm intrigued...but not enough to cop yet another streaming service.

If this were on Amazon or some shit I'd be down.


I haven't seen a single episode of the other new Trek for the same reason.


They should put old Letterman episodes on that shit. I'm trying to think of anything else CBS has that could sweeten the pot, and I got nothing.
737802, I'm pretty sure they have a free option.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Jan-23-20 05:42 PM

It plays commercials during act-breaks or something, like a network broadcast. I haven't used it though.

I'm enough of a Trek fanatic that I've had CBS All Access from the start, even between seasons. But I've never watched anything other than Discovery and the three or four disappointing episodes of Twilight Zone that I got through. Occasionally I go there to catch a Colbert interview or something. Even the old Star Trek shows I still watch on Netflix, maybe just out of habit.

I'd definitely watch old Lettermans if they posted them, but I'm probably one of very few. More importantly, Dave's CBS deal was so good that I think now he actually owns the episodes. So they'd have to cut a deal for that.
737866, oh I didn't know this...thanks for the heads up
Posted by Stadiq, Tue Jan-28-20 06:30 PM
>
>It plays commercials during act-breaks or something, like a
>network broadcast. I haven't used it though.

I'll have to look into this...

>
>I'm enough of a Trek fanatic that I've had CBS All Access from
>the start, even between seasons. But I've never watched
>anything other than Discovery and the three or four
>disappointing episodes of Twilight Zone that I got through.
>Occasionally I go there to catch a Colbert interview or
>something. Even the old Star Trek shows I still watch on
>Netflix, maybe just out of habit.
>
>I'd definitely watch old Lettermans if they posted them, but
>I'm probably one of very few. More importantly, Dave's CBS
>deal was so good that I think now he actually owns the
>episodes. So they'd have to cut a deal for that.
>

Didn't know that, good for him. Of course, that makes me feel it is far less likely old episodes will ever see the light of day...
737867, Turns out I was wrong.
Posted by stravinskian, Tue Jan-28-20 08:55 PM
The tier with commercials is cheaper ($6 instead of $10), but there isn't a free option, other than a 1 week trial period.
737836, I’m in this boat. I love Star Trek but I don’t have CBS Access
Posted by calij81, Fri Jan-24-20 07:55 PM
737805, My wife is bonkers excited for it
Posted by Walleye, Thu Jan-23-20 08:08 PM
I'm not averse, but I didn't watch it growing up and this will be the first Star Trek series that I may actually watch in any sort of complete, systematic way.

In any event, I'm gonna watch it. I'm actually more curious to see how committed TNG fans react to it than anything.
737811, Okay, the first episode is FUCKING fantastic.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Jan-23-20 10:02 PM
A LOT of shit in there for the hardest of the hardcore Trek fans. Callbacks to isolated incidents and characters from major and minor episodes, quotes of musical themes going all the way back to the original series. We've been getting A LOT of hokey fan service from Star Trek lately. This is not that. The writers are the fans here.

But it's very much also modern, 'gritty', world-building, peak-streaming TV. I don't think you'd have to have seen a single episode of Star Trek to get into it. I'm obviously very biased, so I could be wrong about that.

The first episode of Discovery made me a little sad and embarrassed (though it eventually had its moments, and I think it's set up something great for next season). The first episode of Picard has exceeded my stratospheric expectations.
737812, Yeah yo I'm excited
Posted by Nopayne, Fri Jan-24-20 12:05 AM
I think there was really solid world building going on here. I can't wait to see where this story goes.
737840, Good first ep, IMO
Posted by Rockscissorspaper, Sat Jan-25-20 11:00 PM
Nothing mind blowing. Mostly set up for the rest of the season, obviously.
737875, RE: Picard
Posted by go mack, Wed Jan-29-20 10:18 AM
I'll wait for it to finish, do a 7 day trial and binge.
737884, This was fun as hell / dumb TNG questions
Posted by Walleye, Thu Jan-30-20 01:00 PM
I really liked it. In my view, sci-fi as a genre inherited a film/literature project that came more from westerns (like, cowboy shit - not "the west" as a cultural phenomenon) than from hardboiled/noir. The latter has an anthropology that fits more closely with my own in the sense that it has a Catholic view of the perfectibility of the human person rather than a Calvinist one - but that observation isn't a necessity. Nobody has to do it that way, and I've really enjoyed some of the exceptions, like Blade Runner.

This one is starting off structurally like noir. It's got a central mystery that really feels like it's going to pull the noir feint of not ending up as the actual mystery. And we've got a tired and (sorta) reluctant "detective" in Picard. That makes me really happy.

I have one dumb TNG question that I'm just going to ask here because I was embarrassed to ask my wife: was Data canonically different from all other synthetic beings in the series as well? or is that new information?
737891, RE: This was fun as hell / dumb TNG questions
Posted by Nopayne, Fri Jan-31-20 12:10 AM

>
>I have one dumb TNG question that I'm just going to ask here
>because I was embarrassed to ask my wife: was Data canonically
>different from all other synthetic beings in the series as
>well? or is that new information?

Data was always considered unique. At the time, he was the most advanced synthetic lifeform in terms of his ability to learn and adapt to others around him (technically there were a few others who were his relatives but we can ignore them for now).
737894, Thanks!
Posted by Walleye, Fri Jan-31-20 10:24 AM
That's heartening. I was curious how they'd deal with new viewers for a continuation (of sorts) for a series that had such a devoted following. Seems like they found a fluid way to do exactly enough exposition for a newbie like me. Not clunky (and was that Allison Pill?) and only the information that I need to follow the Picard plot without doing homework.
737944, Episode 3:
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Feb-06-20 09:55 PM
Am I crazy or is Dr. Jurati a plant? How did she randomly show up with a disruptor?
737948, That was kinda weird.
Posted by stravinskian, Fri Feb-07-20 05:27 PM
Maybe the idea is it was dropped by one of the guys our heroes had just handled. That wouldn't really make sense, though, because it would mean she ran in to the fracas. I assume it was just a trope for comic effect, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if they engaged in misdirection with some of the characters. They certainly did that with Discovery (for that reason I kinda doubt they'd do it here; but if the whole season is gonna be about the Tal Shiar...).

Great ep, though.

Speaking of plants: this might be obvious and it might just be a stylistic device. But there are flowers, especially orchids, all over the place in this show. Dahj/Soji's dad is an orchid expert (Bruce Maddox's new profession? Or do the people who Dahj and Soji consider their parents even exist?). Dahj has a variety named after her. There were some weird moving orchids in Dahj's apartment. Picard was arranging flowers before the doctor arrived. And then in ep 3, whatsername plucked something out of an orchid and smoked it. I think there were more examples I'm forgetting. Don't know if it means anything but I'm watching for it now.

Also, after we found out that Maddox is supposedly on "Freecloud" I'm sure I wasn't the only person to look up the lyrics to the Bowie song (Wild Eyed Boy From Freecloud) to see if there might be clues in it about what's ahead. I imagine the reference is intentional. It looks like they're gonna meet their swordsman friend there, but I don't remember him having particularly wild eyes.
737955, RE: That was kinda weird.
Posted by Nopayne, Sat Feb-08-20 09:55 PM
>Maybe the idea is it was dropped by one of the guys our
>heroes had just handled. That wouldn't really make sense,
>though, because it would mean she ran in to the fracas. I
>assume it was just a trope for comic effect, but I certainly
>wouldn't be surprised if they engaged in misdirection with
>some of the characters. They certainly did that with Discovery
>(for that reason I kinda doubt they'd do it here; but if the
>whole season is gonna be about the Tal Shiar...).
>
>Great ep, though.
>

They keep doing weird things and I can't decide if it's Discovery sloppiness or actual plot points lol. Another one was when Dahj got killed they made a point out of saying that there wasn't a trace of her body left iirc.


>Speaking of plants: this might be obvious and it might just be
>a stylistic device. But there are flowers, especially orchids,
>all over the place in this show. Dahj/Soji's dad is an orchid
>expert (Bruce Maddox's new profession? Or do the people who
>Dahj and Soji consider their parents even exist?). Dahj has a
>variety named after her. There were some weird moving orchids
>in Dahj's apartment. Picard was arranging flowers before the
>doctor arrived. And then in ep 3, whatsername plucked
>something out of an orchid and smoked it. I think there were
>more examples I'm forgetting. Don't know if it means anything
>but I'm watching for it now.

I haven't noticed the orchid motif but I'll definitely keep an eye out.



>
>Also, after we found out that Maddox is supposedly on
>"Freecloud" I'm sure I wasn't the only person to look up the
>lyrics to the Bowie song (Wild Eyed Boy From Freecloud) to see
>if there might be clues in it about what's ahead. I imagine
>the reference is intentional. It looks like they're gonna meet
>their swordsman friend there, but I don't remember him having
>particularly wild eyes.
>

Maybe I misunderstood the preview for next week but I don't think we're going to get to see Feecloud just yet. We'll see!
738060, Spoiler:
Posted by stravinskian, Fri Feb-21-20 05:36 PM

God dammit Aggie!

Even after you said it, I didn't see it coming. Especially after they showed us that they'd been together. Actually really strong writing. They let us (or at least me) think she was freaking out over the stress of the rescue operation, when in fact she was freaking out over what she'd have to do if the operation succeeds.

They'd put so much work into making her the "Ensign Tilly" of this show, which I guess she still might be. But the Commodore must have terrified her about something.

By the way, when they talk about the "Fenris rangers," I assume that's a reference to "Fenrir's wolf," or "the Fenris wolf," who in Norse mythology kills Odin at the end of the world. They're certainly setting up poor Soji to do something terrible. And either the rangers or the Romulans (Romulus and Remus were wolves in Roman mythology) to stop her. I hope it's not another "AI kills all the people" story, but I guess that's the assumption they intend for us to make.
738089, This show doesn't seem remotely in the TNG universe
Posted by handle, Wed Feb-26-20 02:31 PM
Picard himself is solid, everything else is pretty standard dystopian future stuff .

We're supposed to believe it devolved that quickly in 20 years?

I'm still watching - but it does not seem Star Trek at all to me.
738099, Point taken, but there's never been a very uniform "canon" in Star Trek.
Posted by stravinskian, Fri Feb-28-20 05:24 PM
Over the course of the TNG show, they went back and forth about six times on the question of whether there would even be such a thing as money in the 24th century.

At various points in the original series, TNG, and the TOS movies, they claimed there was no such thing as swearing in the 23rd or 24th centuries. They've completely changed that rule, but they started doing that all the way back in the Generations movie, if not earlier.

And definitely there's a lot of conflict and intrigue going on here that's pretty foreign to the TNG years. Supposedly Roddenberry tried to ban the TNG writers from ever suggesting any conflict or even forceful disagreement between starfleet characters. Any antagonism was supposed to be coming from outside the Federation. Obviously they didn't keep that practice up even through the first years of TNG.

And by the time DS9 started (the best of the Star Trek shows, as far as I'm concerned), the prevalence of Federation "bad guys" got A LOT stronger. We had the great Ben Sisko falsifying evidence to draw the Romulans into a war (one of the best Star Trek episodes, as far as I'm concerned), admirals imprisoning officers to hide their evil schemes, and even the appearance of "section 31", which they've now retconned all the way back to the "Enterprise" show. All this intrigue in the Picard show about a hidden Romulan running Starfleet Intelligence and hiding a secret plot is really just a variant of all those section 31 stories.

As for 20 years: 20 years it a lot of time. 20 years ago, today, is pre-9/11. Obviously American society (which the Federation was always meant to represent) has changed a lot since then -- in many ways for the worse. In the Star Trek canon, they've supposedly had two wars with massive civilian casualties, and an uprising of "synths" on Mars, again with massive civilian casualties, all along with the even bigger changes to Romulan society.

I'll give you the fact that the dystopian elements are pretty banal. Not really new even for Star Trek shows. But I think they're exploiting those tropes well, to tell a much richer story than they normally tend to tell, about loss, frailty, age, and exploitation. They couldn't really do that in TNG, with its episodic structure. I think they started to do something like that in DS9 and attempted to do it at times in Enterprise.

738105, You make good points, maybe I'm jsut tired of the same dystopia
Posted by handle, Sun Mar-01-20 11:52 AM
>I'll give you the fact that the dystopian elements are pretty
>banal. Not really new even for Star Trek shows. But I think
>they're exploiting those tropes well, to tell a much richer
>story than they normally tend to tell, about loss, frailty,
>age, and exploitation. They couldn't really do that in TNG,
>with its episodic structure. I think they started to do
>something like that in DS9 and attempted to do it at times in
>Enterprise.

I think the completely utopian Federation was the fantasy element I enjoyed the most.

At least this one is moving time in the forward direction more than not - that's my issue with Trek for the last 20 years - that they're behind where we started.
738090, a.k.a. Everybody hates Jean Luc
Posted by PG, Wed Feb-26-20 04:36 PM
I've been enjoying it... Shimmy is not so into it and pointed out that it's a real downer cause everybody is mad at him the whole time.
738141, Episodes 6 & 7 though
Posted by KingMonte, Thu Mar-05-20 05:37 AM
738148, This show keeps getting better and better.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-05-20 07:51 PM
Not sure how I feel about what happened to Hugh, or the XB's. And I'm really getting tired of the slimy Zhat Vash siblings. The showdown between Elnor and Whatsername was embarrasingly melodramatic, but I got my hopes up that we'd be done with her as a character. On a more moderately critical note, I'm a little disappointed that Doctor Jurati got turned by something as narratively trivial as a mind meld. On the other hand it looks like the next episode will explore what she saw a lot more deeply.

But I'm willing to pick those nits because overall episode 7 was one of the most satisfying episodes of Star Trek I've ever seen. They gave Riker and Troi so much backstory, and they were able to spell it out in a way that didn't feel like a data dump. It all felt emotionally relevant.

Kestra was named after Troi's sister. A pretty obscure character only mentioned on one episode of TNG and one episode of DS9, but very emotionally relevant to Deanna. No idea if "Thad" was named after anyone. I don't know if I like the idea of people being named "Thad" in the 24th or 25th century. But I guess Riker's from Alaska.

Anyway everything with Kestra was great, particularly the stuff between her and Soji (though I'm not at all convinced Soji would be so okay with finding out her sister died, her parents didn't exist, and all of her memories from more than 3 years ago were fake).

The real star of the episode, though, was Deanna Troi. I wasn't expecting that. They'd made such a big deal out of the reunion with Riker (which was also great), that I thought Troi would just be some kind of appendage along for the ride.

But I'd been noticing, and all the episode reviews I'd seen had been starting to point out, how frequently the old-man Picard acts like an entitled piece of shit, with no apparent empathy for other people. The moment Troi called him out on his bizarre obliviousness to what Soji was going through, was the kind of Star Trek that we've never really seen before. And of course it had to be Troi who did it. Really Troi was a more essential character her than Riker. I never much liked the Troi character. Seemed like a very dated nineties thing to even think that the "ship's counselor" would be senior staff. But she was an important character in TNG and she's never been better than she was here.

The moment that Riker just immediately knows Soji is an android, that was pretty great too. Also, him yelling "Shields up!" or whatever analogous thing he said, just like the old days. That was obviously intended to excite old Trekkies like me, but it had its intended effect.

I'm a little shocked that we're down to the last three episodes, and we don't entirely know what the hell's going on yet. But that gives me the feeling these last three episodes are gonna be really damn good.
738149, Agreed, mostly
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Mar-05-20 10:15 PM
It was great to see Troi but Riker's interaction with Picard got me in the feels.

That said the Troi and Soji scene passed the Bechdel test so good job there, writers.

I thought the whole Riker family was great and I was scared to death that something terrible would happen.

Jurati still sucks though. She's gotta go.
738150, Oh yeah and that sick bay scene.
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Mar-05-20 11:04 PM
I couldn't stop laughing at how the "replicator" was literally just a 2020 era 3D printer. I don't know the exact model but it looked like this:

https://cdn03.plentymarkets.com/ioseuwg7moqp/item/images/23388/full/Flashforge-Adventurer3-Adventurer3-23388.jpg
738151, Yeah someone mentioned that in an article a few weeks ago.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-05-20 11:11 PM

I think Dahj had the same model 'replicator,' but they never took as close a shot of it. I think it was an intentional Easter egg.

I think they made it too obvious in that scene though. I could see the ill-fitting plastic and it looked out of place.
738152, Oh yeah I'm sure 100% intentional
Posted by Nopayne, Fri Mar-06-20 01:19 AM
Still got a chuckle out of me.
738156, i really like the show (spls)
Posted by rob, Sat Mar-07-20 04:23 PM
i feel like there's a lot of unnecessary collateral damage to characters that could use more building - icheb especially but even hugh. it feels like they're trying to get them out of the way for seven's arc but they're already plenty bastards enough.

the thad situation was worse - especially given how much loss troi has already dealt with in her immediate family.

the narrative tone overall though is something i appreciate though - especially if they let this setting/time period settle and breathe. none of the new chars are close to built out yet. and they already have discovery for going fast.
738158, Enjoying it, but moving too fast | TNG was so damn good
Posted by calminvasion, Sun Mar-08-20 12:44 PM
Anything with Patrick Stewart as Jean-Luc ( not JL! ) Picard can get all my $$. I like the overall Arc, but it just seems like certain character motivations are confusing because they've not been given enough time to actually flesh them out. ( the entire ship crew specifically)

That said, the feels and joyful nostalgia has been wonderful. The character Picard has been my North Star as a leader, and no hyperbole as a man. Just an incredibly written and acted character. And the biggest thing this show has done, is get me to accelerate my TNG rewatching. I’ve already been doing it the last year or so on Netflix, but since Picard started I’ve picked it up. Typically watching 3 episodes a week. The moral compass of that show and the character in particular is timeless.

I just watched 4.21 The Drumhead this morning- scary how well it reflects our current times. Which TNG seems to do well pretty damn consistently.
738272, The Drumhead was/is a great episode
Posted by spenzalii, Tue Mar-24-20 11:21 AM
How that manage to extract so much out of a bottle episode I'm not smart enough to figure out.
738249, I'm actively tempering my expectations for the finale
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Mar-19-20 04:04 PM
There are two many open threads at this point for them to effectively wrap up the story at this point imo.

Best case scenario is we get a few well placed cliff hangers for season two.

Worst case is we get a shitty frenetic Discovery style finale.

Time will tell!
738254, Conceptually though, I like what it's saying
Posted by KingMonte, Fri Mar-20-20 11:10 AM
In a world where I'm forced to be part of facial recognition (that's already proven to be racist) and will soon be sharing the road with driverless cars (they ALREADY got bodies), humans are fucking idiots. This is chickens coming home to roost. Skynet on a galactic scale...unless it's some kind of orchestrated ploy by organic beings, which would be an interesting turn.

...but fuck all this involuntary AI integration.
738255, I'm in it more for how they say it than what they say.
Posted by stravinskian, Fri Mar-20-20 01:09 PM
The old 'organics vs synths' trope is so worn out at this stage that I really wish they weren't taking it there. Though the question of where the Borg fits in that dichotomy is interesting and may give them some interesting things to do in the finale. (Obviously there's a reason the writers ended up crashing a cube onto the planet...)

As a story, part 1 of the finale was pretty subpar, I think. But the little things about how they did it made it really special for me. It actually got me reading about art history

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_in_Arcadia_ego

and poetry

https://circleuncoiled.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/w-h-auden-et-in-arcadia-ego/

and thinking about life, death, time, decay, and creativity in entirely new ways. This is the core of the story and they've been setting it up masterfully, I think. When that first android went up to Picard and traced the wrinkles on his face it was a direct reference to the shepherd tracing the shadow on the Arcadian tombstone and discovering art.

Also, Patrick Stewart acted his ass off in this episode. He won't get any Emmy attention for this, because it's Star Trek and it's CBS All Access, but he should be a lock for a best actor win from this episode. I might have cried when he told Jurati that the tricorder was fine, and when he told the crew about his condition, and when he told Raffi he loved her too and then immediately ran off.

I was skeptical when Stewart said he didn't want to come back to Star Trek, but he couldn't turn down the outline that Chabon presented to him. At this point I believe him.
738273, I';m hoping the androids get turned to Borg
Posted by handle, Tue Mar-24-20 11:33 AM
And Seven gets control of them all. (And then kills every one in the sector.)

I'd also be trying to find Q.
738289, My thoughts on the finale. (spoilers obviously)
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-26-20 05:23 PM
I've only watched it once so far. I'm sure my appraisal will change somewhat upon repeat viewings.

I don't normally say this or even notice it, but I don't think it ended as strongly as it started. I worry that I might come off like one of those insufferable "The Last Jedi" haters. But Star Trek is more important than Star Wars.

I still adored the season as a whole, and there were some things I genuinely appreciated in the finale, but it didn't deliver all of what I'd wanted it to deliver. Ironically, I think the problem is that it's now a multi-year series. Even though that was officially the plan from the beginning, and even though they were greenlit for season 2 before the first episode even aired... still, I was viewing it as something more like a miniseries than a full series. I wanted more finality.

It felt like the writers were dithering a bit on what the endgame would be, and they ended up with something that cheapened nearly all of their options. The idea of bringing in the irumodic syndrome from the TNG finale, and using it as a driving emotional (and logistical) center for all that followed, that was my favorite thing about how they conceptualized this series. And then they just threw it all away with the dumb "golem" thing. Picard sacrifices his life to save humanity! Then, lucky us, there was a golem right here (with conveniently unformed biological tissues) and a guy who knows something about transferring memories from a human brain! Nothing has to change. Jean Luc survives after all! And he's an android now. Sort of. He's a biological android, but he doesn't have any "special powers" like the others do. The body is the same as it ever was. We never have to mention ever again that he's now a "synth." He's still an old man. He's still gonna die, some day. The only thing that's different is they fixed his parietal lobe, magically took away the disease that he'd been coming to terms with this whole time. Does this mean they've now cured ALL diseases, even death itself? Sadly, no, because Bruce Maddox only built the one golem before he was killed. Dammit Aggie!

Wasn't there a classic Simpsons bit about everything comes back to normal at the end of every episode. I got the feeling here that everything was going back to normal, way too easily.

It reminds me of the end of Discovery season 2, when suddenly everyone decides (for some reason I don't even remember) "we will never talk about Michael Burnham or the Discovery or the spore drive or Control ever again."

There were so many different paths they could have taken. The three that were going through my head:

* Picard dies but Data is resurrected into the golem. From there on Captain Data leads a new crew (with Raffi, Rios, Elnor, and conveniently-pardoned Jurati as senior officers) in a new ship named in Picard's honor.

* Picard survives but still suffers from the irumodic syndrome. Season 2 (as a recurring side story) involves an even deeper exploration of his mental deterioration. Maybe there's a "new data," maybe not.

* Picard and Data are somehow 'merged' in the golem's consciousness (RIP Tuvix). The new character could be played by Stewart, Spiner, or someone else.

* The most satisfying ending would have probably been the most obvious one. Picard sacrifices himself for Soji, saves the universe, dies, the show continues (I guess) as the crew carries on in his name. This is what I thought was happening right up until he walked into the light. I honestly thought they were doing the afterlife scene really well. I will say, I'm GLAD it didn't go this particular way, because Patrick Stewart really was the best part of this show. So I'm glad we didn't lose him.

Anyway, I'm VERY glad Alton Soong didn't turn out to have been Lore all along. A lot of people seemed to be expecting that in reviews of episode 9. And I like the fact that they strongly implied, without outright saying, that it wasn't actually a super-advanced synthetic civilization they were contacting; it was just "Control" from Discovery. I guess they'll be able to explore that some more in Discovery season 3, which I'm now really looking forward to.

I'm a little disappointed that we didn't get to find out whether the Admonition was left by the Tkon empire, and more, that we didn't get to find out more about the Tkon empire. Maybe that'll be a part of what happens next season. Or maybe it was all just idle Trekkie hypothesizing. I rewatched The Last Outpost a few days ago. Shitty episode! But there's something romantic about a long-lost ancient society in Star Trek. I wish they did it more.

Despite all my quibbles (which are really almost entirely isolated to the golem thing), I still think this show has been as good as Star Trek has ever been. I'm looking forward to the next season, whenever it's safe again for an 80 year old man to spend long days on shooting sets. Thankfully, from what I understand, they finished all the filming for Discovery S3 before Coronavirus came along. That might be all the Star Trek we get for the next few years. But I'm looking forward to it. They're finally free of the shackles of prequelism and able to do big new things.


Oh, one last thing: "Blue Skies" is a dumb fucking tune. I'm glad we don't have to hear it again.
738294, Ha, those Prospero lines from The Tempest.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-26-20 08:08 PM
I just rewatched it. Liked it a lot more the second time around. I think the first time through my annoyance at the lazy golem idea tainted my view.

I'm still not happy with a few aspects of the episode. But I can come back to my pattern of 'liking how they're saying it' making up for my quibbles with the story.

In particular, the closing got to me more this time than the first time. Those lines from The Tempest are hardly obscure, but I looked up the whole quote:

"
Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
As I foretold you, were all spirits, and
Are melted into air, into thin air:
And like the baseless fabric of this vision,
The cloud-capp'd tow'rs, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
As dreams are made on; and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.
"

As Data died, they had Data, then Picard, then the whole room, melt 'into thin air.' (A phrase that Shakespeare invented here, BTW.)

Next episode of Star Trek on my list is Emergence, in which Data plays the part of Prospero and gets notes from Picard. It's one of my favorites (new Vertiform city!).

By the way, anyone who isn't following Patrick Stewart on instagram should know that he's been reading the sonnets, one each day, during the lockdown. Pretty great so far.
738295, just one watch here. i agree with your sentiments.
Posted by rob, Thu Mar-26-20 08:55 PM
It bothers me that the Romulan characters and the millenium-spanning plot device ended up being really nothing. Narek and Narissa were involved in a couple horrible one liners too. Giving and receiving.

I think there was a way in which Lore could have been written into it that would have been satisfying. I love every Soong clan member that he's ever played but this just turned into a rehash of the dynamics with the Augments arc in Enterprise.

I was also hoping Picard would die as well at some points.

Ultimately I agree with you - they're really hemmed in by what Stewart and Spiner can and will do and what fans expect from them - but their best out could have had Jeri Ryan take over - she's been one of the better characters on the show but just doesn't get enough time/space to breathe. Her scenes with the Romulans were particularly bad because they were obviously just rushing to get to the climax - and then she had that scene with Rios and you'd never know she could totally relate to his captain issues. Missed opportunities. (I reserve judgement on the fingers entwining for future seasons.)

I agree about the golem. And I hate that they doubled-down on the lazy. Make him immortal or nearly so or even glitchy. Give him something to wrestle with.

The fleet actions also really bothered me - the fleet compositions were very very much not fucking Star Trek and it's not like ship models don't already exist. Scores of identical ships out of nowhere also don't make sense in the context of everything we know of Starfleet's mobilization capabilities from previous series and the whole first half of this season.

Riker was a nice touch - more with that family please. Zheng He was a fantastic name for the flagship. The writers definitely get referencing Star Trek lore and the kinds of things a historian/archaelogist like Picard would pay attention to.
738297, Yeah I am SO tired of campy, scenery chewing villians.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-26-20 10:28 PM
I'd hoped they'd be limited to Discovery (and I worry they might constitute the entirety of the "Section 31" show, if/when that comes together).

I don't remember them doing much of that in TNG. The one case I can clearly remember is the original version of the Ferengi (the shitty episode I just mentioned, "The Last Outpost"). But they quickly learned it didn't work. I guess they did it in all the TNG movies (apart from, maybe, Generations). That's part of why they're all shitty, apart from First Contact where the scenery-chewing villain was the only weak point.

They're clearly setting up a lot to explore with Seven of Nine. And I agree, Jeri Ryan did fantastically well here. I don't know if she'll be in season 2 of Picard. I've seen some chatter that this might have been a long-form audition for maybe doing a series around her in the future. God knows how many Star Trek shows they're thinking about. (Weren't they also thinking about a show with Anson Mount and Rebecca Romijn? And I think that animated show is still moving along.) Maybe this is why I've been viewing Picard more like a mini-series. If they're really thinking about all these shows they can't be thinking about seven seasons of each of them.

I liked seeing Riker too. I should have known he'd lead the fleet when they showed him in the "previously on..." summary. I kinda hoped they'd find a way to sneak in Geordi or Worf, but then I might have complained about the fan service of it. Supposedly they're hoping to get them in next season.

I will say, seeing Riker leading the fleet, I was reminded of the later TOS movies, and all the jokes about how everyone had gotten fat. Real future-Picard looks better than the future-Picard from All Good Things. Real future-Riker does NOT look as good as the future-Riker from All Good Things. Good for him, enjoying all those pizzas.
738298, Fat Worf would be fun
Posted by rob, Fri Mar-27-20 12:05 AM
I wonder if Dorn could be convinced to wear even more prosthetics.
738310, Solid, not great. But my god Agnes is the worst
Posted by calminvasion, Sat Mar-28-20 02:06 PM
She’s badly written, but I also think the actress just isn’t very good. And especially when she seems to be setup as the comic relief in many instances, and it fell flat every time.

Really thought the last scene, with introducing the implied, out of nowhere, romantic link between Rafi and 7of9 + the reunion of rios and Agnes was a bad choice to end it. Could have left that out completely. The latter especially because the Rios/Agnes thing was probably the most poorly executed aspect of the season.

But looks like we are stuck with her for season 2.

On the bright side, I think the actress playing Soji and her different permutations was great.

I also think I appreciate how Patrick Stewart is playing this, with extreme vulnerability. But It’s still feels unsettling. But it’s 25-30 years later, and it really plays well on the theme of the finiteness of organic life and the inescapability of old age. To that point, I loved his facial expressions when the told him they didn’t upgrade or supercharge him in any way when they put him in the new body. As an aside, what a cyse that that was a one time thing and they can’t replicate that again and make it a more broadly available thing
738327, I think I pref Orville
Posted by handle, Sun Mar-29-20 08:40 PM
Almost everything about Picard seemed wrong - except for Picard himself.

And season 2 better have those sentient super advanced killing claws show up like the Borg did after Encounter at Farpoint.
747709, As do I, but seeing some of the old gang together was dope.
Posted by spades, Wed Mar-29-23 12:01 PM
738442, It made me sad.
Posted by Nopayne, Mon Apr-13-20 03:34 PM
I didn't bother upping this thread because there wasn't really much to say.


>Really thought the last scene, with introducing the implied,
>out of nowhere, romantic link between Rafi and 7of9 + the
>reunion of rios and Agnes was a bad choice to end it. Could
>have left that out completely. The latter especially because
>the Rios/Agnes thing was probably the most poorly executed
>aspect of the season.

The Rafi and Seven moment bugged me at first because it seemed completely out of left field. In retrospect I'm willing to give it partial credit because they did imply that Seven rolled that way in her scenes with Bjayzl. However they needed to do more to seed her bond with Rafi.
747604, S3 E4 - really good maybe great Trek episode
Posted by calminvasion, Wed Mar-15-23 10:52 PM
Looking back at this post, can't help but be sad by how excited I was about this. I just love JLP as a character. S1 started ok but just kept getting worse. S2 was meh, maybe slightly better.

This season is an improvement, but still quite flawed. Thankfully this is it.

But E4 is really good, and honestly it can be consumed as a standalone. Feels very much like a really good TNG episode. Don't get me wrong still s lot of corniness and cheap nostalgia, but honestly I'm here for that. It's a window into what this whole series could have been.

Anyway, for Trekkies who bailed out, i recommend it
747607, I've been biting my tongue but this season is... great?
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Mar-16-23 02:40 PM
It feels like it actually takes place in the Star Trek universe finally. Seasons 1 and 2 tried to be different which is great, but they ended up playing out like generic sci fi plots.

My one nit so far is the amount of fan service. I really expected Quark to show up in the middle of E4. Even this seems fine to me though because it's the last season.

I'd love it if they gave the new show runner his own show but honestly, I feel like Paramount is dialing back their Trek investments at this point.
747608, lol, I’m here for the fan service
Posted by calminvasion, Thu Mar-16-23 07:45 PM

>My one nit so far is the amount of fan service. I really
>expected Quark to show up in the middle of E4. Even this
>seems fine to me though because it's the last season.

Try new stuff with the other shows, but this feels like it was always meant to be TNG prologue

Also, I really like the character and actor playing his son. Nice addition. I fux w/ Giordi’s daughter too.
747610, Eps 4 and 5 were as good as Star Trek has ever been.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-16-23 09:20 PM
And I loved eps 1-3 too.

Everyone's talking about a Shaw/Seven/LaForge/Titan spinoff now, and it does kinda seem like the showrunners were trying to encourage that. I think I agree with you that we likely won't see any new ST for a while other than SNW (which has also been surprisingly good). But if they do it I'll definitely be there for it.

I really liked season 1 of Picard, though I understand many of the complaints people had about it. Season 2 had some cool moments but really turned into a massive disappointment in the end. But season 3 is turning into everything I'd ever hoped for in a 'grownup' Star Trek show. The spoilery guest in ep 5 was totally surprising and shocking, but the story they made of it was probably the best human drama I've ever seen in Star Trek.
747663, And then they give us "The Bounty"
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Mar-23-23 09:33 AM
Some fun things in episode 6 -- great to finally see Geordi again, in particular -- but some of the plotting in this episode quickly reminds me of the worst features of the last half of season 2.

Moriarty was corny, but I was afraid he'd be much worse. The crow was cool, and the whistling thing, meh. It's so disappointing to see them resort to bringing Data back from the dead, AGAIN.

Cute that they pulled the cloaking device out of the ship from Star Trek 4. I don't know why they didn't pull the much more modern one out of the Defiant (or just steal the Defiant itself, which would have set up a bunch of cool scenarios, though would have also required the show to give up their flashy and expensive Titan sets and spend money on old fashioned ones). But maybe we can assume that one was too complex for quick removal, or maybe it was surrendered back to the Romulans at the end of the Dominion war, or something.

What really annoyed me (and worries me for the rest of the season), was the plotting of the episode. It seemed like something out of late Game of Thrones to have the heisters wander Daystrom Station for what looked like fifteen minutes (already an implausibly long span while those two ships' crews are trying to find them right at the core of the station), while the Titan crew flies to some distant place, spends hours catching up with Geordi, reminiscing about their favorite ships, stealing and installing a 200 year old cloaking device, and eventually flying back. Do they not notice in the writers' room how little sense this makes?

Oh yeah, and while Vadic is supposedly hunting down all of Picard's connections, she chooses to start with Deanna Troi, living quietly on Nepenthe with her daughter (assuming the Troi we saw wasn't a changeling fake, which might set up some interesting dialogue next ep), rather than Geordi, who seems to have personal control over multiple ships and multiple cloaking devices? Really?

Noticed that on my second viewing, which is definitely not my last, maybe not even my last today. Even when I'm furious at the writers, it's still Star Trek lol.
747699, regarding cloaking:
Posted by Nopayne, Tue Mar-28-23 07:15 PM
My original head canon is that the Romulans quickly repossessed the loaner cloaking device after the Dominion war ended.

Another more probably explanation that I heard is that only the original Defiant had a cloaking device. This is the second edition that the re-commissioned after the original was destroyed. Damn that's a deep cut.
747700, Reasonable points.
Posted by stravinskian, Tue Mar-28-23 08:50 PM
I wouldn't say it's an obscure fact that that's the second Defiant (the Sao Paulo with a new name). I'd kinda forgotten that though and definitely don't remember whether the second one had a cloak.

And it's a very valid point that the Romulans would have taken back the cloak at the end of the war. I don't remember whether that happened or not, but it seems likely given the other intrigue around the cloaking device.


I'll say that my opinion of this episode has improved with time and repeat viewings. I still don't think the timing makes sense, but I think the rest of my complaints can be chalked up to the usual conventions of the show.

I'm still mad that they brought back Data, and I'm really not looking forward to Lore, who I never liked. But those are just my issues.


On the other side, I'm getting increasingly interested in the question of who "The Face" represents. Current guesses are either Gul Dukat's pah wraith, mostly just because it would connect to the Dominion and to Ben Sisko, who is rumored as a top secret guest at the end; or Armus, the oil-slick creature who killed Tasha Yar, for the similar reason that it might give them a way to loop her in to the finale.

I'd rather it be Dukat (even though he wasn't really in TNG, except as a different Cardassian). But I think Armus might be more likely, because Matalis said the story would ultimately revolve around a story in TNG that was never resolved.
747701, lol… I liked ep. 6 too. I’m clearly a sucker for nostalgia & TNG sappy call backs
Posted by calminvasion, Tue Mar-28-23 10:56 PM
I can overlook a lot, as king as you give me that sweet, sweet fan service

Can’t disagree on the timeline and other points, but they didn’t bother me live. Id get worked up about the data thing, but none of the first two seasons of Picard are actually headcanon for me so I don’t mind.
747848, The ship visuals this season are amazing.
Posted by Nopayne, Thu Apr-13-23 02:44 PM
The shot of the Borg cube in particular got me. I won't mention some of the other surprises, yet. I think they are way overused in general but they at least found a way to make them terrifying again.
747852, One ship in particular, of course.
Posted by stravinskian, Thu Apr-13-23 07:29 PM
I'll admit I got emotional when I heard that computer voice again.

Fan service? Well yeah. But this is the kind of fan service I think everyone wants and deserves.

There's a dozen or so elements of this episode that I could say, in isolation, were "disappointing," or "sloppy writing," but the really cool shit outweighs all that by at least a factor of 10.


(One spoilery note: I wonder how annoyed Todd Stashwick was to repeatedly hear everyone say that there needs to be a Titan spinoff with him the captain. And he had to play along with vague statements like "nothing is in the works, but if it happens my answer is yes!" Knowing full well that they killed him off (kind of unnecessarily, I think) and what the writers were really hoping to kick off was a spinoff with Seven as captain and everyone *but* him in the crew (and that unfortunate Vulcan science officer).)
747891, Solid end to a solid season
Posted by stravinskian, Sat Apr-22-23 06:14 AM

(of a sometimes shaky show)

There's a dozen things I might complain about in the finale alone, but it would just seem petty after all the fun I had. As silly as TNG sometimes was, it was honestly important in my life like no other show, and I'm satisfied with how they closed it out.

They were really pushing in this finale to get some buzz going for that "legacy" spinoff. I hope it happens. (From what I hear about the state of streaming TV these days, it probably won't.)

747895, Agreed on all counts
Posted by calminvasion, Sat Apr-22-23 09:27 PM
Ending it with the poker game was a nice touch