737304, Yes and no. And I'm not a Snider fan or apologist Posted by spenzalii, Mon Dec-16-19 03:09 PM
>I totally hold it against him for creating a film that fully >misunderstands the material. Yes, of course film wasn't the >best medium to tell the story. However, the fact that he made >an utterly empty shell of the original is ultimately his >fault. Lindelhof and team could have made the SAME mistake and >created something that was 'Watchmen' in name only. The thing >is, they didn't and not just because of the medium. Because >they understood what makes Watchmen tick (yuck).
Two different things. Linselhof and Co. crafted a story in the world the graphic novel created. Snider and Co. tried to translate the world the graphic novel created. I think any director and writer would have come up with a shell of the story if they tried to show it as a mainstream movie. I'm not defending any of his stylistic or story choices (though I think remixing the squad attack was probably a good idea for the masses), but I"m not sure any other director's choices would have been much better, ultimately.
> >I would be very happy if they left this as a one and done and >I don't think Lindelhof will just jump back in for no reason. >Everything I've heard from him has shown a great degree of >care and respect, if not reverence he has for the material and >the awareness and willingness to get out of the way. > >They would be fools to do it just because of the success of >this season and a beyond fools to do it with anyone else.
Here I agree. If this is an anthology, I'd be happy. Going forward could work, but almost isn't necessary (on a practical level the amount of nudity that story would need is daunting). If this ends up being a one shot I would be perfectly fine. Don't Matrix this one, leave on a high note and KIM
|