>up until the not sexy part.
>
>So I agree with what he said, except the not sexy part.

No shit. That’s what we’re talking about.

>You here breaking down how people can have a difference
>opinions of attractiveness like that's what we're arguing.

Meanwhile PU had two posts in quick succession…. arguing just that…..and you cosigned both of them and like him, added additional meaning to his words to…..argue his personal opinion of Gal’s attractiveness.

>You are the derailment.

False. That began with you and PU taking the detour into his his personal opinion of Gal’s attractiveness. I observed and commented on your derailment.

>This is a message board bro. We argue things all the time.
>Movies. Tv shows. Actors. Broads. Basketball Players.

Cool story. I agree. Thing is, people are pretty selective when they want to live and let live. You and PU are always so taken aback when posts take such detours, yet quite often you’re contributors in your own right.

This is one such occasion.

>When cats wanna turn this shit into a freedom of speech
>talking point, miss me with that.

I have no idea what you’re talking about here.

Reply some more so you can pretend that you're not a participant in this.