>Telling people who are overreacting as though this is a
>horrendous choice that the movie won't be horrendous isn't
>done to endorse the film. A little context goes a long way,
>and this part of your response pretty much pretends that
>people here and elsewhere aren't acting like they cast Pauly
>Shore as Batman or some shit.

Not sure when I said I was speaking for everyone or why I need to take into account the over-the-top Anti-Afflect people in my reply? Context doesn't matter in this case. If I agreed with your points, I'd agree. I don't. And saying, "Well, other people are overreacting" doesn't improve them.

I don't think that his latest performances make him any better of a fit for the role of Batman. I doubt that Goyer and Snyder, who already vetoed Christopher Nolan on Superman killing Zod, are going to just tell Affleck, "Sure buddy, you tell us where we're going wrong."
I'm not saying Affleck can't do it; I'm just saying nothing I've seen from him gives me confidence, especially when Snyder is the one directing the project.