>Some films intentionally
>befuddle you in order to cover their lack of true substance,
>their lack of true things to "get."

>This of course is all subjective. But if I don't get it, and
>I've looked closely, and I have determined in my opinion that
>it's not my fault but rather poor execution from the
>writer/director/whoever, then I am quick to say it's a bad
>movie.

I feel this way about I'm Not There. I don't understand it, but I'm also convinced there's a lot of smoke and mirrors to cover up that the film didn't really have anything to say...that there's really nothing underneath to understand (but then I have similar suspicions for a lot of Dylan's work lol). A friend asked me if it's a good movie last weekend, took me some time to answer her.