Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn
Topic subjectYou post like the Fat Kid from "Lean on Me"
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=455183&mesg_id=455615
455615, You post like the Fat Kid from "Lean on Me"
Posted by Orbit_Established, Fri Jun-05-09 07:03 PM


1)Oh yeah, you switched speeds. Note how all of your
"elaborations" on points you made after your first
review have been wholly negative. You haven't elaborated
on a single good thing in the film, which is proof that
you don't think for yourself, but are upset and mad
about life.

2)Even on the good things that you mentioned, you are
clear to make sure Tyler Perry had nothing to do with them.
So your backup strategy, after getting mad at me has been:

"Orbit, the film is good, but I won't give Tyler Perry
a smidgen of credit for it, because it would hurt my feelings
even more than they are hurt, and I'm about to hang myself
as it is."


I not only got you watching movies, I got you admitting
they are good, and then I make you feel so bad for doing
so that you backtrack and switch speeds, and get flustered
and upset.


That's why I'm a winner in life.


>Did I not point out that the characters were one dimensional.
>Did I not say that the there was a dues ex machina ending and
>that the film was predictable? Did I not mention that there
>was a lot of unnecessary exposition?

Its funny, because now you're EXCLUSIVELY talking
about the negatives. You didn't do that until
after you realized that O_E rules your day. I made
you stop what you were doing, watch a movie, say it
was good, and then get SO MAD, you switched up your
opinon.

>Come on fam...I'm elaborating on my points cuz you were
>jumping around like you won some shit.

LOL - no, you're getting more negative because you've
been embarassed.


>It was...but that's fucking bare minimum for a film. A film
>should engage me. That doesn't make it special, it just means
>it isn't complete shit. You're mistaking brass for gold
>homie.

^^^^Haha. Now you're putting a negative spin on the
fact that you were "engaged."


I mean, this is wonderful.



>What new negative shit? Those are elaborations on points I
>already made in my original response.

Correction: NEGATIVE elaborations. Notice how you haven't
elaborated on the positive. You'll probably do it now,
but its too late because I've already sniffed it out.

Your opinion has changed -- you seem to like the film
less and less with each post, and again, its because you're
made at ME.


>If you take anything away from this. Remember this. Tyler
>Perry is not, I repeat not a good writer. This, the best film
>that I've seen by him, does not have a good script.

LOL - negative elaboration.

>See when I say things like it was predictable and the
>characters were one dimensional it means that that it wasn't a
>good script.

Negative elaboration on good movie: "It was good,
but Perry's writing had nothing to do with it."


>But that's just it. It wasn't good. Bates and Woodard are
>better actors than Perry is a writer/director.

Negative elaboration on a good movie: "It was good, but
the actresses did it and not Tyler Perry."

>Please don't tell me this is the first time you've seen an
>actor give a good performance despite a weak script.

That happens all the time. Problem is, this film isn't
guilty of that.


>You're basing that on what? Your assumptions about the
>characters or what was actually in the film? The most you
>could go off of was Lathan bringing up their estranged father.
>But the amount of information contained in that scene couldn't
>possibly give you enough to make your baseless claim.

Well, no, actually.

>The character was a saint. Saying she was probably this or
>probably that don't work...wanna know why? Cuz it wasn't in
>the damn film.

Actually, it was.

And even if it was, Tyler Perry had nothing to do with
it, did he?

LOL

>Wanna know why there are no positives? Cuz you're being a
>tool.

At least you're honest.

>I said the film was good. What you're mad because I
>don't think it was Citizen Kane? Damn stop being so insecure.

No, but you've decided to elaborate on the negatives
and not the positives and absolve Tyler Perry from any
credit for the film's positives.

Its pathetic and in plain view for everyone to see.


You're enraged, doggie.

>What did I say earlier in this debate? I said if I thought the
>film was good I'd admit it. Which I did. But I also thought
>the film was problematic and not worthy of being called
>masterpiece or even great for that matter. But I guess someone
>giving an honest opinion doesn't sit well with TP fanboys.

But you've continuously elaborated on the film's negatives
and not positives, which is unfair and a sign that you're disdain
for ME is influencing your opinion of the film.

OE dictates YOUR OPINION, which is another reason I'm a
black stallion.

>Translation: I spend all day on the internet baiting people
>because I've got nothing better to do. I'm like a 12 year old
>on Xbox live, I dedicate a lot of time an energy into being a
>douchebag. Damn I wish I had real friends.

Hey, you didn't make me watch no movie.

You SPECIFICALLY watched the movie because of ME.

That's a *swish* for the Orbster.

>It wasn't a damn good movie homie...just regular old good. At
>its best it'll end up a TBS saturday afternoon staple or it'll
>be some shit someone rents, mildly enjoys, and never thinks
>about twice again.


Mad?


----------------------------

http://www.dkmsamericas.org/register-today-and-help-save-natasha-and-others


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.


"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop"