>People like me don't take the question of whether
>or not EWS is a great movie seriously because
>we've heard dozens of miserable arguments from people
>trying so hard to convince themselves that it is
>good. None of them are coherent, or consistent,
>and most have to do with either a bullshit appeal
>to the "brilliance" of Stanley Kubric, or some
>similarly bullshit appeal to the movie "not needing
>to be about anything," which is sort of your
>argument.

Hey! I thought you said you respected that argument. Now I'm offended.
(But again, it wasn't an argument. Just an observation.)

>All are just plea cops and not reasons.

I'm glad to see that you've got it all figured out.


>>(These people being, by the way, from what we see comparing
>>the thread to the poll result, the vocal minority.)
>
>People don't voice their opinion in here because they
>are generally afraid of meeting the same fate as you
>are.

^ Great. He already thinks he's in a flamewar.

You're too emotional. Go have a latte and calm down.


>Their reasons for liking it are probably dumber than
>yours.
>
>This it PTP, after all, and most of the guys don't have
>Y chromosomes, and probably want to fuck Tom Cruise.

Tom Cruise is a Scientologist. They have special powers.


>>I don't know you all that well, but one thing I do know is
>>that I shouldn't care what you consider to be necessary or
>>wanted.
>
>I don't know you at all, but I do know bullshit when
>I see it.
>
>And miss me with that "what is art?" appeal.
>
>Nobody asked for it. Not necessary.

Nobody asked for your opinion on my opinion, either. But oddly enough, you're giving it anyway. You're a man of mystery.

>Keep it moving, yo.
>
>
>
>>All sorts of things have all sorts of things to do with all
>>sorts of other things. But that isn't necessary or wanted
>>here.
>
>Well that point certainly was out of place and unnecessary.
>It also has nothing to do with anything.
>
>So there you go.

"A structure is like a bridge, from nowhere, to nowhere."

So there you go.