>>not as good as rushmore and tenenbaums, though.
>>
>wow, we're completely opposite. i go life aquatic >>>>>>
>darjeeling >>>>>>>>> tenembaums >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rushmore

man, i'm really adamant about my "rushmore" fandom. i honestly don't think he'll make a better movie than "rushmore." and our lists ARE exactly opposite! i think he struggled in "life aquatic" because he had too many characters and each of them were just imbued with a quirk and were more props than even characters.


>>for a 90 minute film, it felt long. the middle section
>dragged
>>quite a bit and i'm not sure why. none of it was really that
>>boring or anything.
>
>it certainly felt long. there were a few points from about 15
>minutes from the actual end to the actual end where it
>could've and i thought probably shouldve ended...particularly
>when they left the mom in nepal, i thought it would end
>shortly after that....

i had read the script and knew what was going to happen and was surprised when i felt the film should be almost over before they even met their mom, but i knew there was at least 30 minutes of movie left.