>As if you don't have a "note." Please, you're the most
>predictable
>poster on here.

Really? Is that so? What is my "note" then? And why is it I can make posts about more than one movie or about "Check out how I make these people 'mad'. I'll say I liked a movie they hated!!!"


>Don't matter! Rodriguez >>>>>> Tarantino.
>
>In fact, the only reason Tarantino has mattered in the
>past few years has been because of Rodriguez. That's
>why he's on dude's dick so hard.
>
>Rodriguez = the actual filmmaker Tarantino wishes he was.
>
>Tarantino = the white guy that Rodriguez needs to be to
>get acclaim.
>
>Symbiosis.
>
>
>Sort of like how I'm the man you wish to be, and
>you're the, well, stereotypical dickhead that I like to
>smack around and shit.


This post ain't about that, and I'm not about to get into it.


>>Anyway, good luck with this argument. We had it months ago
>>though.
>
>
>You're still upset that I changed your view of Pulp Fiction
>forever. That one really stung. I ruined a perfectly good
>experience for you. I'd be mad too.
>
>Just don't read my posts, kitko.


Once again with your one note. We get it dude. You don't like Pulp Fiction. KIM. Now address what my first post in here was about which was: YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT ABOUT SPIDERMAN 3.

Need it again? Just in case?

YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT ABOUT SPIDERMAN 3.

This shit has been discussed ad nauseum. So again, this is nothing new so stop acting like it is.