Go back to previous topic
Forum namePass The Popcorn
Topic subjectOE here to tell y'all why SPIDERMAN 3 is going to be GARBAGE
Topic URLhttp://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=270496
270496, OE here to tell y'all why SPIDERMAN 3 is going to be GARBAGE
Posted by Orbit_Established, Thu Apr-05-07 02:34 PM

I'm back.

I'm busy as fuck, but I gotta tell y'all this real quick.

I might make a quick cameo to tell you how terrible the
new gimmicky Tarantino flick is, but maybe not.

Man does QT suck. I'm going to relaunch my anti-Pulp Fiction
campaign in summer of 2007, so watch out.


Anyway, Spiderman 3 is going to be garbage. Don't fight it.
You know that. Here them reasons:

1) You've finally realized that Kirsten Dunst is ugly.

I knew it from birth. She so ugly, she made me walk out of Jumanji and
I wasn't shit but a pubescent niglet when is seent it. Y'all on the other hand
drank the dimepiece Kool-Aid. Because you've now realized she ugly,
and even you nerdy muffuckaz can do better, you're not going
to be interested in the scenes with her in them. They finnna
make you go to sleep. She's not interesting, and neither is her
character. Its hard to be emotionally attached to a characther(Spiderman)
who is consistently scrapping over an ugly broad. Don't work.


3)They've violated the 'Batman Returns' rule:

TOO MANY GODDAMN CHARACTERS. C'mon, dun.

Mr. Sandman? Venom? That Goblin young nigga? Too much.


And this overarching theme of 'Battling yourself' is ghey and
played out, and on the humble THEY ALREADY DEALT WITH
a lot of that shit in Spiderman 2. Done already.

This movie is going to play out like the old WWF Hulk Hogan
sequences from the 80s and 90s. Hogan would be getting
his ass whooped, would be about to be pinned and then
some shit would happen and he'd get life in one arm and the
gradually get up and do that bright eyed deep breathing
shit to the crowd. Then he'd slam someone and do that
boring leg drop shit and it was a rap.

That's gonna be Spidey in this movie.


3)I must preface this with a no-homo, just because I got to.

Tobey Mcgwire is plain uninteresting to look at. His boyish
innocent I'm naive bullshit look on his face can't carry 3 movies.
He is not only the whitest person on earth, his range ain't that solid.
Don't get me wrong, he's a good actor and all, but I'm saying he
can't carry 3 movies. Youda been better off casting someone with
a big ass scar on their face, or a dude with surgically reparied nostril
or something. Something that catches attention.

And real talk: Peter Parker's character isn't actually written
very well. I know his appeal is that he's supposd to be a
"regular kid that everyone can relate to" and that's cool, but
he's a grown man and I want to see some real views on something..
...I don't know, have a scene where the nigga recyles some cans or
something..man up, bitch.




I hope its good though. I just think its gonna suck.


And which one of y'all told me to see 300? That was some
April Fool's bullshit a month early, so fuck y'all.



----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop
270498, you nailed this one
Posted by bshelly, Thu Apr-05-07 02:43 PM

>1) You've finally realized that Kirsten Dunst is ugly.

Ego Trip nailed this one first, but we must constantly remind the young and impressionable, lest they fall trap to the great media conspiracy. Thing is, I think white women think she's attractive. They're the only ones I've ever head say anything good about her.

All I can say is, hope she's saving this cash, because the well will dry up real quick.

>3)They've violated the 'Batman Returns' rule:
>
>TOO MANY GODDAMN CHARACTERS. C'mon, dun.

This is the big thing. You don't need a lot of villains. What made Spidey 1 and esp 2 so great is that they understood this. Give us one villain and develop him, so that when stuff starts to blow up we'll care. There's no way I'm going to care about any of these villains or whether Spidey beats them.

FF2, however, is going to win. SILVER SURFER.
270508, man how great would it've been if Scarlett Johansson had been cast as MJ?
Posted by 40thStreetBlack, Thu Apr-05-07 03:07 PM
that would've been the best shit ever.

>This is the big thing. You don't need a lot of villains.
>What made Spidey 1 and esp 2 so great is that they understood
>this. Give us one villain and develop him, so that when stuff
>starts to blow up we'll care. There's no way I'm going to
>care about any of these villains or whether Spidey beats
>them.

yeah. I mean they needed to wrap up the story with Harry so I guess I understand having Goblin Jr in it. I see where they are going with Sandman I think, but they could've still managed without him so I think they overextended themselves with that. but I'll reserve judgement until I see the movie.

Venom is gonna be fucking badass regardless though.

>FF2, however, is going to win. SILVER SURFER.

sarcasm? I'll still watch it to see SS yoke Johnny up by the neck, fly him up to the edge of space & drop him back to earth, but I'm not expecting the movie to actually be good or anything.
270518, was she supposed to be?
Posted by bshelly, Thu Apr-05-07 03:22 PM
i think they learned the lesson with the first FF. i think we see more fighting, and more of Doom being the real Doom.

Plus, SILVER SURFER.
270791, wow.
Posted by FortifiedLive, Fri Apr-06-07 09:57 AM
i always say, "at least kirsten got some tittaes." but scarlett--now those are some titties.
270797, how the fuck kiersten dunst have titties
Posted by bshelly, Fri Apr-06-07 10:07 AM
270809, RE: you nailed this one
Posted by theMindofFury, Fri Apr-06-07 10:28 AM

My old lady hates Dunst with a passion. Both are caucy.

C

"This brother is free, I'll be what I want to be."
270499, ^^ thinks he's spitting revolutionary thoughts ^^
Posted by Ryan M, Thu Apr-05-07 02:43 PM
Everyone has known Horsey was ugly. People have been on the multi villian shit since the casting was announced. But yeah, keep thinking this is all new material.
270517, ^^^Camped out for 'DEATH PROOF' Tickets
Posted by Orbit_Established, Thu Apr-05-07 03:16 PM
>Everyone has known Horsey was ugly. People have been on the
>multi villian shit since the casting was announced. But yeah,
>keep thinking this is all new material.

Yes you is.

You not neven going to see the superior half of that
double feature directed by that there LATINO filmmaker.

Lol

----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop
270619, Go ahead and address the issue at hand.
Posted by Ryan M, Thu Apr-05-07 07:29 PM
Or you just wanna stick to the same note you've been playing for years now?

Its funny you're now mentioning Robert Rodriguez as a good film maker when you denounced him in the Sin City post some time ago. And yeah I'm gonna skip his film...cause I hate Latinos. Can't stand the lot of em. You good now?

Anyway, good luck with this argument. We had it months ago though.
270625, The problem is that, well, you're a dipshit.
Posted by Orbit_Established, Thu Apr-05-07 07:58 PM
>Or you just wanna stick to the same note you've been playing
>for years now?

As if you don't have a "note." Please, you're the most predictable
poster on here.

>Its funny you're now mentioning Robert Rodriguez as a good
>film maker when you denounced him in the Sin City post some
>time ago. And yeah I'm gonna skip his film...cause I hate
>Latinos. Can't stand the lot of em. You good now?

Don't matter! Rodriguez >>>>>> Tarantino.

In fact, the only reason Tarantino has mattered in the
past few years has been because of Rodriguez. That's
why he's on dude's dick so hard.

Rodriguez = the actual filmmaker Tarantino wishes he was.

Tarantino = the white guy that Rodriguez needs to be to
get acclaim.

Symbiosis.


Sort of like how I'm the man you wish to be, and
you're the, well, stereotypical dickhead that I like to
smack around and shit.



>Anyway, good luck with this argument. We had it months ago
>though.


You're still upset that I changed your view of Pulp Fiction
forever. That one really stung. I ruined a perfectly good
experience for you. I'd be mad too.

Just don't read my posts, kitko.
270659, RE: The problem is that, well, you're a dipshit.
Posted by Ryan M, Thu Apr-05-07 09:15 PM

>As if you don't have a "note." Please, you're the most
>predictable
>poster on here.

Really? Is that so? What is my "note" then? And why is it I can make posts about more than one movie or about "Check out how I make these people 'mad'. I'll say I liked a movie they hated!!!"


>Don't matter! Rodriguez >>>>>> Tarantino.
>
>In fact, the only reason Tarantino has mattered in the
>past few years has been because of Rodriguez. That's
>why he's on dude's dick so hard.
>
>Rodriguez = the actual filmmaker Tarantino wishes he was.
>
>Tarantino = the white guy that Rodriguez needs to be to
>get acclaim.
>
>Symbiosis.
>
>
>Sort of like how I'm the man you wish to be, and
>you're the, well, stereotypical dickhead that I like to
>smack around and shit.


This post ain't about that, and I'm not about to get into it.


>>Anyway, good luck with this argument. We had it months ago
>>though.
>
>
>You're still upset that I changed your view of Pulp Fiction
>forever. That one really stung. I ruined a perfectly good
>experience for you. I'd be mad too.
>
>Just don't read my posts, kitko.


Once again with your one note. We get it dude. You don't like Pulp Fiction. KIM. Now address what my first post in here was about which was: YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT ABOUT SPIDERMAN 3.

Need it again? Just in case?

YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT ABOUT SPIDERMAN 3.

This shit has been discussed ad nauseum. So again, this is nothing new so stop acting like it is.
270705, But my penis is enormous + I said what I said about Spidey 3
Posted by Orbit_Established, Thu Apr-05-07 11:16 PM

>Once again with your one note. We get it dude. You don't like
>Pulp Fiction. KIM. Now address what my first post in here was
>about which was: YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT
>ABOUT SPIDERMAN 3.

Subject line.

>Need it again? Just in case?
>
>YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST TO SAY ANY OF THAT SHIT ABOUT SPIDERMAN
>3.


Subject line.

>This shit has been discussed ad nauseum. So again, this is
>nothing new so stop acting like it is.

Subject line.
270800, where good OE posts go wrong
Posted by bshelly, Fri Apr-06-07 10:11 AM
1) OE makes a good post but uses his needlessly confrontational tone.

2) Other (usually white) poster makes a reply of debatable neccessity asking OE to calm down a bit.

3) OE resorts to well substantiated intellectual arguments such as

>As if you don't have a "note." Please, you're the most
>predictable
>poster on here.
>
>Sort of like how I'm the man you wish to be, and
>you're the, well, stereotypical dickhead that I like to
>smack around and shit.
>
270812, Why don't you calmeth that asseth downeth.
Posted by Orbit_Established, Fri Apr-06-07 10:41 AM
>1) OE makes a good post but uses his needlessly
>confrontational tone.

C'mon. That's the only reason y'all even click
because the shit is entertaining.

>2) Other (usually white) poster makes a reply of debatable
>neccessity asking OE to calm down a bit.

Whoa. I mean, at least be fair in how I get responded
to. People HATE off cuff. Right out the gate.

And PTP cats are the most sensitive posters
on here. There's more testosterone on the
freestyle boards than on here.

They stay getting they panties in a bunch whenever
I say something.

>3) OE resorts to well substantiated intellectual arguments
>such as
>
>>As if you don't have a "note." Please, you're the most
>>predictable
>>poster on here.
>>
>>Sort of like how I'm the man you wish to be, and
>>you're the, well, stereotypical dickhead that I like to
>>smack around and shit.


I thought that was funny.



----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop
270911, i'm the dalai llama in this bitch. i'm just saying
Posted by bshelly, Fri Apr-06-07 02:46 PM
270500, 1,2,3
Posted by Ceej, Thu Apr-05-07 02:47 PM
270511, Better Spiderman: 3, or..............3?
Posted by ErnestLee, Thu Apr-05-07 03:11 PM
270541, i dont care if she is ugly or not
Posted by justin_scott, Thu Apr-05-07 04:13 PM
personally, i don't think she is, but the bottom line is that she fits the role of mary jane perfectly for me.

second, i haven't seen the movie, so i can't say if they made three villains work, but the first two films were made wonderfully, so i'll give them the benefit. besides, i'm glad to see more villains

and lastly, tobey is without a doubt the perfect peter parker. looks like him, acts like him.

i don't know. i haven't seen anything yet to make me change my opinion that the spiderman films and the franchise is by far the best comic book adaptation into movies. i thinking top five movie right now
270548, Hold on now...
Posted by deacon, Thu Apr-05-07 04:19 PM
This may be more of a gripe with Sam Raimi, but where is Spider-Man's sense of humor?! My favorite part about his fights in the comic were the insults he made about the supervillains. They have the angst and frustration of Peter down pat, but not the goofy side.
270553, RE: Hold on now...
Posted by Brother_Afron, Thu Apr-05-07 04:39 PM
I noticed they tried to slip some quips in during his fights in Spider-Man too, but as a whole the dialog-during-punches thing can only be done on a comic page.
271228, RE: i dont care if she is ugly or not
Posted by DredScott, Sun Apr-08-07 03:12 AM
>and lastly, tobey is without a doubt the perfect peter parker.
>looks like him, acts like him.


wrong...

topher grace woulda been the perfect peter parker if the series ever rebooted with new actors. too bad it'll never happen now since he's venom.
270546, lmao
Posted by Mgmt, Thu Apr-05-07 04:16 PM
Great post.
270549, wait- it's because KD is ugly,TM is plain, and too many bad guys?
Posted by Cold Truth, Thu Apr-05-07 04:25 PM
you go off on this long winded diatribe and those were the best you could offer?

gotcha.

the three villains thing i can see, the other two are beyond laughable.
you remind me of my friend ho launched into a massively moronic tirade about why oceans eleven will suck because "everyone knows you can't break the rule of twelve".

how about things like casting, plot, script, direction, etc?
nah, lets nitpick on how attractive the two (quite well established) stars of the film are

and tobey as peter parker, both in action and writing, is almost dead on. the only thing they didnt nail was his smart ass side. but then yu nitpick his lack of "views". as if the whole "with great power comes great responsibility" and struggling with sacrificing his personal life fr the greater good of the innocent people that inhabit his city isnt enough of a powerful view. this shit isn't about making political statements, the story is about personal responsibility and sacrifice. take your ass elsewhere if you want that shit. you sit here and complain about the movie having too many villains yet you want to sacrifice even more precious screen time to hear peters thoughts on global warming?

and t be honest, with what i have read in regards to the way this has been written, the three villains will be far less of a problem then most think. raimi has done an excellent job thus far; lets reserve judgment until we actually see the movie on this one. michael bay has left us with plenty of other shit to bitch about.
270554, kirsten dunst got that nagging tooth yo. yuck.
Posted by PlanetInfinite, Thu Apr-05-07 04:41 PM

what's to understand?
you get a boner.
you slap her titties around some.
and stick it inside her and pee.
http://www.myspace.com/thievinstealberg
http://computerstupid.blogspot.com
270555, I can do it faster than you.
Posted by janey, Thu Apr-05-07 04:45 PM
1. Spiderman
2. 3
= A comic book movie now in its third iteration.

ummm, hello?
270585, allow me to negate your entire argument even quicker
Posted by buckshot defunct, Thu Apr-05-07 05:55 PM
1. webshooters
270594, I laughed
Posted by janey, Thu Apr-05-07 06:12 PM
it took me a minute to understand what a webshooter was, but then I laughed
270709, ^^^ Gets it.
Posted by magilla vanilla, Thu Apr-05-07 11:53 PM
270610, right. thse are PRECISELY why it will "suck"
Posted by Cold Truth, Thu Apr-05-07 06:57 PM
no ifs ands or buts about it

there is no possible way they could make a good trilogy
it could be the greatest movie ever made and the lot of you would denounce it simply for that reason
270664, ^^^Well-educated Hater
Posted by JRennolds, Thu Apr-05-07 09:21 PM
SPIDER-MAN!
270621, O, you my dogg and all, but fuck all that shit you talkin
Posted by Basaglia, Thu Apr-05-07 07:43 PM
nigga, i just wanna see them powers. i fucks wit ALL comic book movies...NOPE!!! all of them...even daredevil.

i go see them powers and i smile and i leave.

fuck a story...more villains with them powers the better...fuck love interests.

all y'all niggas crazy actin like these comic book joints should even be judged like other films.

to me, these shits is like porn...i like what i see, even when it's bad. NOPE!

http://fiyastarter.com/fs-pages/fs-ent-moviereview-xmen3.htm

^^^^read and it and understand where i'm coming from on this.
270666, Yup.
Posted by Ryan M, Thu Apr-05-07 09:24 PM
You can't judge these movies like you do other films whatsoever. I enjoyed the hell outta Spiderman 1 and 2. X-Men 1 was good, 2 was great, 3 was cool. It's all about the spectacle and while I think Spiderman 3 won't be up to par, it'll be entertaining at worst.
270778, FF 2 will suck
Posted by analog2digital, Fri Apr-06-07 09:15 AM
but I'm going to see the Surfer, cause it looks like they got him halfway right.

That's all there is to it.

Now, Batman is a different issue. He needs some story/intrigue/prep-time moments.

270622, kirsten dunst is "uncute" @ my homegirl
Posted by kayru99, Thu Apr-05-07 07:44 PM
my only problem with the film on the surface is the costume...oh, that surfboard thing that hobgoblin rockin look kinda goofy, but it's a spider-man movie...goofy comes along with it
270626, Did Batman Begins suck because of too many villains?
Posted by SoulHonky, Thu Apr-05-07 08:00 PM
I think Spiderman 3 is going to work the same way. I doubt any of the three villains are connected. It's not like Batman 3 or 4 where they were working together. I wouldn't be stunned if they barely overlappy; as in Parker defeats Hobgoblin at the start of the film, Sandman is the focus of the final act, and Venom doesn't appear until the very end (in a sort of cliffhanger).

I'm a fan of Tobey as Spiderman and although I've never thought much of Dunst, I think she fits better than some smoking hot girl. The fact that she's Parker's girl makes it a little more believable. Peter Parker can cozy up to Dunst whereas Bruce Wayne should be doing better than Katie Holmes.
270632, in the comics Mary Jane is supposed to be a model.
Posted by Ason, Thu Apr-05-07 08:17 PM
Then again they combined her with
Gwen Stacey
so I guess it works
270667, Scarlet Johansen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guerra >>>>>>>> Dunst.
Posted by JRennolds, Thu Apr-05-07 09:26 PM
And that is a fact.
270730, scarlet is fugly too. that bitch is mad dykish
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Apr-06-07 02:30 AM
deep voice and all
270802, please
Posted by bshelly, Fri Apr-06-07 10:12 AM
you'd shoot your load if she looked at you.
270935, wow, you know such much abuot me that i dont even know
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Apr-06-07 04:37 PM
tell me more

the bitch is manly. just cause everyone else seems to think that shits attractive doesn't mean i do to
at best, i would trophy fuck (trophy as in her status, not her looks) and sell the still frames to the tabloids and porn mags
i've fucked plenty more attractive
course you'll tell me that i'm smoking rocks or dreaming or some shit
but then you have the magical ability to know hat i like and what i don't, so there is that

shes the same homely chick she was in ghost world
the rest of you have been fooled by the island and people magazine
270810, i wonder if she and alicia keys fucked on the set
Posted by Basaglia, Fri Apr-06-07 10:31 AM
270693, Doesn't he also invent web-shooters in the comic?
Posted by SoulHonky, Thu Apr-05-07 10:29 PM
She's an actress in the film. I can buy it. Personally, I think it would seem really odd to have a really hot girl as Mary Jane and sticking with Maguire's Parker.
270763, RE: Did Batman Begins suck because of too many villains?
Posted by Ausar72, Fri Apr-06-07 07:59 AM
He said "Batman Returns" not "Batman Begins" in the original post.
...

my thoughts,

peace.


----------------------------------
"BE, not foolish, as temporary king of the mountaintop."
-Com's Pops, BE 2006
270790, I know. But Betman Begins had multiple villains as well
Posted by SoulHonky, Fri Apr-06-07 09:52 AM
And was good.

Having more than one villain doesn't mean the film is definitely going to suck.
270937, shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Apr-06-07 04:40 PM
270663, ^^^Rains on parades like, Odin (or some shit)
Posted by JRennolds, Thu Apr-05-07 09:20 PM
But ay, you have a point with the "Too Many Characters in SM3 Argument". That is my only concern besides...#2 sucking miserably! Bastard, thanks for crushing my hopes...

Oh and, Batman was dope and Tarantino is a genius! Hater.
270697, I agree, but will still probably see it in the theater
Posted by will_5198, Thu Apr-05-07 10:33 PM
just because

1 + 2 were not that impressive (2 was SO FUCKING LONG...YES, GIVE US ANOTHER DRY, BORING SCENE BETWEEN MAGUIRE AND DUNST)

3's casting of Topher looks highly suspect and I'm not a big fan of either Maguire or Dunst to begin with
270701, well I'm pumped like May 4 is the last day of school
Posted by Tiger Woods, Thu Apr-05-07 10:46 PM

that jawn looks incredible

yeah I buy the hype, but f it, I'll be damned if number 2 isn't one of the best movies to come out in the 2000s
270751, you lost me at pulp fiction.
Posted by m, Fri Apr-06-07 04:22 AM
270758, i actually agree with all your points.
Posted by SdotFly, Fri Apr-06-07 06:30 AM
especially. especiallyESPFUCKINGSPECIALLY #1.
that chick is busted.
270767, You sir are indubitably incorrect.
Posted by rorschach, Fri Apr-06-07 08:20 AM
Spiderman 3 will be just as great as we want it to be.

You mentioned the "Batman Returns Rule" but it really shouldn't be called that since Batman Returns actually worked as a movie. Those later Batman movies didn't work because they were unbelievably corny.

Besides, having more than one villain won't kill a Spiderman movie...just make it more bad-ass.
270794, RE: OE here to tell y'all why SPIDERMAN 3 is going to be GARBAGE
Posted by FortifiedLive, Fri Apr-06-07 10:03 AM
>1) You've finally realized that Kirsten Dunst is ugly.

lol i've known this from the get-go. this chick needs lips.


>3)They've violated the 'Batman Returns' rule:
>TOO MANY GODDAMN CHARACTERS. C'mon, dun.

i question this too. when i heard about X-Men 3, i was wondering how they'd be able to fit all that story in one movie. they pulled it off though, so who knows, maybe Spidey3 will too.


>Then he'd slam someone and do that
>boring leg drop shit and it was a rap.
>
>That's gonna be Spidey in this movie.

lol. just lol.

>
>3)I must preface this with a no-homo, just because I got to.
>Tobey Mcgwire is plain uninteresting to look at. His boyish
>innocent I'm naive bullshit look on his face can't carry 3
>movies.

lol again. does a no homo null and void every degree of homoness? 'cause that's pretty high up there. hahaha jokes, fam.

>And real talk: Peter Parker's character isn't actually
>written
>very well. I know his appeal is that he's supposd to be a
>"regular kid that everyone can relate to" and that's cool,
>but
>he's a grown man and I want to see some real views on
>something..
>...I don't know, have a scene where the nigga recyles some
>cans or
>something..man up, bitch.

i couldn't agree more.

>And which one of y'all told me to see 300? That was some
>April Fool's bullshit a month early, so fuck y'all.

yeah, 300 was waaaaaay overrated. if you take it for what it was--a visually pleasing movie and nothing else--then it was good. but people talk as if it's braveheart or some shit.
270844, So I guest you're not going to see it, huh?
Posted by da_illest_one, Fri Apr-06-07 11:46 AM
just give the movie a chance and take it as it is...
you might enjoy it alot more than you expect...
also, Spider-Man is an open ended comic book franchise, its so many directions that I movie can go with Spider-Man because the character's history has been altered and redone at least 20 times...
trust me, you'll like it after watching it....
270924, never said that.
Posted by FortifiedLive, Fri Apr-06-07 03:37 PM
i actually can't wait for it. i was just co-signing on how it might (keyword: might. i should've made that clear) suck.
270885, my only issue is them adding Gwen Stacey now.....
Posted by KnowOne, Fri Apr-06-07 01:16 PM
eff that....they should have went with her in the 1st one so GG could kill her like in the comic. At first I though well maybe they didnt cuz it would be too dark for kids. But part 2 was pretty effin' dark! Doc Ock was murkin' nukkaz left & right.
270917, i'm dying. lmao!!!!
Posted by jambone, Fri Apr-06-07 03:04 PM
>This movie is going to play out like the old WWF Hulk Hogan
>sequences from the 80s and 90s. Hogan would be getting
>his ass whooped, would be about to be pinned and then
>some shit would happen and he'd get life in one arm and the
>gradually get up and do that bright eyed deep breathing
>shit to the crowd. Then he'd slam someone and do that
>boring leg drop shit and it was a rap.
>
270926, ^^^ POSTING WHILE STANDING IN LINE FOR TRANSFORMERS.
Posted by JusticeSabre, Fri Apr-06-07 03:46 PM
FOH
271252, underrated reply
Posted by bshelly, Sun Apr-08-07 11:08 AM
270933, The trailer I saw during 300 looked pretty shitty
Posted by Smoody, Fri Apr-06-07 04:17 PM
the big fight scene through the skyscrapers & everything looked way fake, the way it was animated called too much attention to the CGI

Plus I can't get over that gray-symbiote suit. It looks wack to me. It should be pitch black.

Totally agree on Kirsten Dunst. Her face looks like a Halloween pumpkin.

270947, now THATS funny
Posted by Cold Truth, Fri Apr-06-07 05:03 PM
>Totally agree on Kirsten Dunst. Her face looks like a
>Halloween pumpkin.
271304, RE: now THATS funny
Posted by Mr. Merge, Sun Apr-08-07 02:02 PM
'Hogan would be getting
his ass whooped, would be about to be pinned and then
some shit would happen and he'd get life in one arm and the
gradually get up and do that bright eyed deep breathing
shit to the crowd.'

...it's called HULKING UP. Jeez.
279516, So, OE was spot on.
Posted by Orbit_Established, Sun May-06-07 10:26 PM


This movie was hot dookie.


----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop
279522, not for the reasons you listed however
Posted by HighVoltage, Sun May-06-07 10:40 PM
279528, I think you were spot on homie. Still it was good for a download
Posted by Ason, Sun May-06-07 10:48 PM
now I'll delete it

it isn't even worth keeping
279540, Absolutely
Posted by Call It Anything, Sun May-06-07 11:43 PM
279564, If black people made this crap, you would love it.
Posted by bignick, Mon May-07-07 12:49 AM
Go away.
279593, The Patented BigNick: "I'm black and need to be revered by YTS" POST.
Posted by Orbit_Established, Mon May-07-07 07:16 AM
>Go away.

Lol.

Why are the black people on these boards the ones that
are so swift to hit O_E with the reverse-racism charges?


White people don't care about you, so stop getting into
a pissing contest with the other black posters, please.


Niggas are not thinking about you, and white people
don't care what you think, so stop defending the yt
race everytime I have an opinion.


What makes you a bigger idiot in this instance
is that my post about Spiderman 3 doesn't have shit
to do with race.

I actually know lots about movies.


But your charges are really stupid because:

a) I thought Fantastic Four, for example, was fucking illmatic,
back when y'all were clowning the shit. The blackest thing in that
movie is Jessica Alba, who isn't black at all.

b) I was the one who liked Spiderman 1 better than 2, and certainly
better than 3. My post was why I predicted Spiderman 3 was going
to SPECIFICALLY suck. I was spot on.


Now, shut the fuck up and search for another strategy to
be respected by whites.


I can give you a hint: White people love O_E in real life,
and its because I don't tend to care what they think, nor
do I hate on other bruhs like that.






----------------------------


O_E: Your Super-Ego's Favorite Poster.



"I ORBITs the solar system, listenin..."

(C)Keith Murray, "Cosmic Slop
279602, i thought you was hatin' at first, but in fact, you were right...
Posted by Torez the Judge, Mon May-07-07 08:10 AM
not only for the reasons you posted,
but because SM3 really felt like a
ego-trip, sam raimi's way of just
'kill billing' a movie by loading
it up with fight scenes and 'cool
villains' and trying to pawn it off
as a whole movie...

AND it had the nerve to be WILD LONG, yo.

it was easily the worst one, imo.
279611, It was GARBAGE(Spoilers)
Posted by Brooklynbeef, Mon May-07-07 08:30 AM
Lowes, I want my money back. The US propaganda was sicking.

Check this true story of my movie going experience:

Peter Parker smacks Mary Jane to the floor.


Crying, MJ asks Peter: "Who are You?"

A 10 year white kid in back of me responses: "I'M RICK JAMES BITCH!"

You gotta love pop culture.
279882, funny & sad. Chappelle made the right move
Posted by Ason, Mon May-07-07 08:54 PM